IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] Homenets and MPVD

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Tue, 03 February 2015 13:57 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E521A0362 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 05:57:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NngFFQP_fL11 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 05:57:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from banjo.employees.org (banjo.employees.org [198.137.202.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FCF31A03A9 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 05:57:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from banjo.employees.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by banjo.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3457F629F; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 05:57:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=employees.org; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s= selector1; bh=hGdLrNez9Jma4Jwi0suWAKkHTJE=; b=P2TafEh7B67ommZtq0 GdRo1jWfmlRNbpLqVTOwEQpF44fP9xEu15IAC6m/ePMZddrCu1mqnhfWcvRZQJ/s RpnSLN6UQ/JLdxq0EjvHYXygBIPG/U6hb5wpvGugEwe2QZ4llXSry5FI6Zfqpdj0 WhG9yP7Is5IUj6eOQjqWSRtcM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=employees.org; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s= selector1; b=J10zE2pLlaH25Dk1XIybV12Lki/Y3xEA8Ky2MeAmpuKF+snHaht Pj5v+FGT8MkpBpygnM7waRXJRdo6P3yJOdJVgbV+GvRivIyw8Gt0StkKRj/swR72 1OVxPD+F1lsUY80g8oQhIEpG5AJKTmPWm9cPKu4ppeiG/9dflYfrfO8c=
Received: from OTROAN-M-Q0RH.localdomain (unknown [195.159.234.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: otroan) by banjo.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF75E628B; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 05:57:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by OTROAN-M-Q0RH.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF753DEBFCA; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 14:57:33 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <3C89B71C-E9FA-44F3-9576-B0A7E9DD6D13@fugue.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 14:57:33 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DEF142FA-C85C-471D-96E5-4773494DBD0D@employees.org>
References: <54D00ECA.1070802@gmail.com> <84ECBDCC-DAE1-4227-B7C6-27978063CB3D@darou.fr> <F7309B04-BBA5-40F0-B87F-118E3F4C2B43@iki.fi> <4193A650-550D-4CA5-B23D-06AECA4F645A@cisco.com> <749396A0-A21C-47DF-94E1-DB3FDB7C1485@iki.fi> <3C89B71C-E9FA-44F3-9576-B0A7E9DD6D13@fugue.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/nYVeQdmyVBagOeRwjeKjUKoABAE>
Cc: HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>, Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>, Pierre Pfister <pierre.pfister@darou.fr>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Homenets and MPVD
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 13:57:39 -0000

>> PVD tell you also about the kind of connectivity available there etc. While I am sure we _could_ fabricate local one, it is much easier to tell that e.g. one upstream connection is pay-per-byte 4g, and other one is VDSL2 and let hosts make educated choices instead of guesses about source prefixes to use.
> 
> One of the design goals of the PVD architecture is to make it possible to get the same behavior in a 4G handset with a Wifi interface and in a laptop with no 4G interface that's connected to a network with a 4G PVD and a wireline PVD.

what behaviour is that?

>> Is this covered somewhere elsewhere in the DHCP option jungle?
> 
> A document is being worked on to address this, but no, it is not yet covered.
> 

cheers,
Ole

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email