Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?

Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> Wed, 15 October 2014 15:21 UTC

Return-Path: <kivinen@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC351A8744 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 08:21:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.137
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.137 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, PLING_QUERY=0.994, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XJ3tD6TAFv6m for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 08:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.kivinen.iki.fi (fireball.kivinen.iki.fi [IPv6:2001:1bc8:100d::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 697021A1B1C for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 08:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fireball.kivinen.iki.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kivinen.iki.fi (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s9FFLCOu019138 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:21:12 +0300 (EEST)
Received: (from kivinen@localhost) by fireball.kivinen.iki.fi (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id s9FFLBc9016841; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:21:11 +0300 (EEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <21566.37095.559360.571810@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:21:11 +0300
From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
To: Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>
In-Reply-To: <5E43B678-A2F9-4289-93E9-A6A98BEE82A1@iki.fi>
References: <72CC13D1-7E7A-4421-B23E-16D8FFAEEB58@darou.fr> <CAAedzxp1R-C5E9RJVMVLRJxPc0w4zooPtqnvWK9eggpZu4=xtg@mail.gmail.com> <C7F3DE60-F596-4BAD-9C28-74006966E5B9@fugue.com> <20141014142746.GX31092@Space.Net> <69B1F2CB-88C6-4211-83F3-11C8A3E7BFD2@fugue.com> <20141014145930.GY31092@Space.Net> <7D59D80C-2BF0-428B-A872-B2922B2D0F98@fugue.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410142043200.30853@uplift.swm.pp.se> <48942796-C098-48B6-B894-544499EEB5F3@fugue.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410150657030.30853@uplift.swm.pp.se> <5E43B678-A2F9-4289-93E9-A6A98BEE82A1@iki.fi>
X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.3.1 (x86_64--netbsd)
X-Edit-Time: 13 min
X-Total-Time: 14 min
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/nyCZ8ptg_qhpyPP1Z5KhB59Acy4
Cc: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, Pierre Pfister <pierre.pfister@darou.fr>, Erik Kline <ek@google.com>, HOMENET Working Group <homenet@ietf.org>, Gert Doering <gert@space.net>, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 15:21:17 -0000

Markus Stenberg writes:
> Because no matter what ISP does, my IPv4 prefixes in my home _are_
> stable. And IPv6 ones too (thanks to using statically configured
> tunnel, cough).

When we defined a recommendation for ISPs in Finland for IPv6, we
suggested that ISPs should always give same prefix to same customer,
and when giving out the addresses, they should set the preferred
lifetime to 7 days, and valid lifetime to be 30 days, i.e. even if the
network connection is down for several weeks, the IPv6 addresses
inside the house are still usable. Of course if there is power outage
and every device in the network looses power, and there is no network
connectivity when they come back up, that usually means there is no
valid IPv6 addresses anymore, unless they are statically configured
somewhere (or stored to the stable storage by the routers). 

> I would argue that flash renumbering is bad too, but I would also
> claim that overlap of less than session lifetime is not acceptable.
> .. some of my session lifetimes are in days (single TCP session). Or
> are we planning to ultimately deprecate TCP and advocate something
> else? MPTCP? Yes, I know typical home user has just HTTP requests,
> but I am not fond of idea of turning the network to
> short-lived-connections only model just because it seems currently
> the most popular way to do things. 

My ssh connections are usually up and running for ever. They only go
down when I update my firewall, there is network problems, or our
company firewall is reset for some reason. Usually that means the ssh
connection is up for few months... I would be very unhappy I would
need to restart my TCP connections every month, so any ISP giving me
such notwork, would not be consider as proper ISP, and I would
immediately switch to another ISP if my ISP starts doing things that
break my connections. 

> Every time I hear about ISP-forced customer renumberings, the more I
> start to think that 1+ ULA prefixes per home is a MUST, not a
> SHOULD. 

Most of my long lived connections are from my office to my home, or
from my home to my summer house. I.e there are some connections inside
my home which are longlived, but also the global IP-addresses need to
be stable enough for my use cases, i.e. ULA would not help me that
much. 
-- 
kivinen@iki.fi