Re: [homenet] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile-06: (with COMMENT)

Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi> Mon, 07 May 2018 19:34 UTC

Return-Path: <fingon@kapsi.fi>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB032128961; Mon, 7 May 2018 12:34:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.351
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.351 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kapsi.fi
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zbUngNZoUNAq; Mon, 7 May 2018 12:34:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.kapsi.fi (mail.kapsi.fi [IPv6:2001:67c:1be8::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5099912783A; Mon, 7 May 2018 12:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kapsi.fi; s=20161220; h=To:References:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type; bh=Wa5GQ+SmapaKHlGONN2GkCtl94VvLhWeEEAaoXInlBo=; b=0YdfA/6iw4Rh2qHzSlws3/iEArWRNzf9AMq7wtzvAtwqv/PkMMjimBcmNvdRVxtSKy+koxRQK8AmBe9IOveTJWrmv+FR08denzRJTamuqCuxj0Wp+dJSen8cP+9/y04Io1sSA+uGXwu5AS2/kpt7LBh6fMwCbbY26+JxpOclYPadMHpzWDiib/YUCE1l9KRi/qYj+vjbX/kMjmYQEMRR+noee9eq3vdU9ykHyusVF+9hdxHPkw34R0jHf8TzSDlcCkaWcdVA5UVtCbKueVOoumqPTZSlsTQoUmqrzRVd2S/MbnBJmh5vLm492Ha3uCBY4c/IdW0uhCCkPWmZVCcP/w==;
Received: from 91-155-69-32.elisa-laajakaista.fi ([91.155.69.32] helo=poro.lan) by mail.kapsi.fi with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>) id 1fFluE-0006zx-68; Mon, 07 May 2018 22:34:42 +0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
From: Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>
In-Reply-To: <87k1sf6z79.wl-jch@irif.fr>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 22:34:41 +0300
Cc: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, homenet-chairs@ietf.org, BARBARA H STARK <bs7652@att.com>, homenet@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <19B2D686-3A6C-4B24-8A86-F2D82412CF74@iki.fi>
References: <152571726188.1261.2707542199316189665.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <87k1sf6z79.wl-jch@irif.fr>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 91.155.69.32
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: markus.stenberg@iki.fi
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.kapsi.fi); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/nzSKsr_7BK4NV7-cLr8Q8DoRlCU>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2018 19:34:50 -0000

On 7 May 2018, at 22.30, Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> wrote:
>> you should refer to 8174.
> Perhaps you could kindly justify your advice?  Non-capitalised "must" is
> used just once in this document, and I don't see any opportunity for
> ambiguity.

Perhaps he refers to the RFC8174 update to the boilerplate:

   === OLD ===
..
   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119.


   === NEW ===
..
      The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL
      NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED",
      "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as
      described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they
      appear in all capitals, as shown here.

   === END ===


-Markus