Re: [homenet] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-homenet-dncp-10: (with COMMENT)
Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi> Wed, 30 September 2015 06:27 UTC
Return-Path: <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37FCD1B5CDA; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 23:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.121
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.121 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mOHQuugm3fEp; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 23:27:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from julia1.inet.fi (mta-out1.inet.fi [62.71.2.232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D32C1B5CD9; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 23:27:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from poro.lan (80.220.64.126) by julia1.inet.fi (9.0.002.03-2-gbe5d057) (authenticated as stenma-47) id 554C787F00B62555; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:23:11 +0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>
In-Reply-To: <20150929204649.4804.89631.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:26:59 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <12FC6E39-7002-482B-A81A-2B2A1C637F4F@iki.fi>
References: <20150929204649.4804.89631.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/ozuf1aqmwCjlBceRZJ-JMYJMvsY>
Cc: homenet-chairs@ietf.org, Mark Townsley <mark@townsley.net>, draft-ietf-homenet-dncp.shepherd@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-homenet-dncp@ietf.org, homenet@ietf.org, draft-ietf-homenet-dncp.ad@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [homenet] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-homenet-dncp-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 06:27:07 -0000
On 29.9.2015, at 23.46, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote: > Thanks for the new appendix B. How should we interpret the "(optional)" > tag on some of the sections of that appendix? For example, does for the > Transport Security section, does (optional) mean the section is optional, > that transport security is optional, or both? It means that the feature being discussed is optional part of DNCP profile; if you have better a way of noting that, let me know :) I guess some sort of blanket statement at the beginning of each subsection would convey the message..? (Multicast subsection actually has paragraph that states ‘if multicast is used..’, making the optional part perhaps bit redundant anyway; the security subsection on the other hand does not.) Cheers, -Markus
- [homenet] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ie… Ben Campbell
- Re: [homenet] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draf… Markus Stenberg
- Re: [homenet] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draf… Ben Campbell