IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] IPv6 & firewall config in a home net

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 02 September 2019 17:58 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC8BF12004E for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 10:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QWlOnZifa86z for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 10:58:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09BD512002F for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 10:58:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF890380BE for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 13:56:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD176E47 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 13:58:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: homenet@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <8F144A4B-0BE2-40C2-AE13-5FAB4AEB5733@fugue.com>
References: <ca32dd0fca31411588917d55556e2a91@rew09926dag07b.domain1.systemhost.net> <8F144A4B-0BE2-40C2-AE13-5FAB4AEB5733@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2019 13:58:15 -0400
Message-ID: <3326.1567447095@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/p2ZB7yCf-ZpL0MRuEV-MnWWhTNs>
Subject: Re: [homenet] IPv6 & firewall config in a home net
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2019 17:58:19 -0000

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
    > Your router should be using PCP to allow servers to open ports and
    > should have a GUI to authorize that, or better yet support MUD profiles
    > and use the GUI to control that.

I meant to mention PCP as well.
Question: do PCP messages always go to the default route?  I re-read 6887 and
that was unclear. RFC7488 did not clarify for me.

How does it work if there are multiple layers of router?

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email