Re: [homenet] agenda planning
Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 23 February 2021 19:29 UTC
Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9DCC3A0E68 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 11:29:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1R7usHkJWaKX for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 11:29:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x834.google.com (mail-qt1-x834.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::834]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED72E3A1086 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 11:29:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x834.google.com with SMTP id b24so12753963qtp.13 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 11:29:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=PF/n5zn16gKezuTZLVuNAbaigGSQ9IcE9NHTtbhAVb8=; b=QsoKU4EfdCrZLnJ8uc1kUF9n+0/EakaaTu0R19IicvS37GJTLTE/ESYZOO0IaJYTjN f0gAPnEkT9EpCh495B9LN53/wi/Ho3ElcwWChaWQqi7oYh66phcB6yOl5Ge80hyf7Rsj GdoXINrEO0j3qGEltTXouGB/woAx/pEUAVxQqhe7QU7gyKsWOABSBbC1MwKWXUxLLFZn jUm706sn5OoFYEyUhGqCH++5PWhA7JTR6wFaIzNRx6dYt0Jt7dkfnzgvEgk7vEgLuOM2 B5X02CNiog2dfHD8nzc/ED+oYKs9St3sevzWmmLfYsk2HpJLVqyhA6HbVdJzHR6xY5ye FMCA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=PF/n5zn16gKezuTZLVuNAbaigGSQ9IcE9NHTtbhAVb8=; b=OgyX1htnY3agN2Oox9fXWlybx/J/dPYOrQVEzV7Xl5r/KgCMjZdK7vK6OIA/KPxJXm Cf70NbnwvGYDAsyEETbiw+kJNClj/uZDaYN5kGSK7iDu0th8dDQIwlPhcUNo/rFhCRrK OB8z8zMs0wUW1u7mGLobQwHaPSdWVMVmJGAWpPkt3uP8Harep9OtuU6VUQ+CAyi+dPUu SKQ0BV7K+lPTGaBoJDpm6U2W/CdmMFAR23Mdmo2VHzq+A93D58OlDTy823KT9rYYqGga ZAED4eMZDzAuoOGynM5MsRW+dGgGkt8mv0wm5GG2y437iCxZaK+iD5LwW5nGrcnf5zVV PCjg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532k+mM6f/+8ktxrQlsWouhnDmxf/izL//4GNuAUncQHSjPMtiIm MkBKzFOZP7em4j2SbnG+M5uVIy0AJm6VMQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy854WXvf8tnfXLyOgb6UR5hEi0o3T8MlDzp0TAStl1Xr4lYlyYQLoKsA08hAMIgWtWOgvnBw==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7599:: with SMTP id s25mr25576366qtq.135.1614108557874; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 11:29:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-24-91-177-160.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [24.91.177.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t54sm13944657qte.8.2021.02.23.11.29.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Feb 2021 11:29:17 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <E101A00F-0218-427F-9C71-17ABF0CAFB1B@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_02C96946-1328-4E25-B941-61701239D76C"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.33\))
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:29:16 -0500
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR02MB69246F1F3C0FD404763D3762C3809@DM6PR02MB6924.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>
To: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
References: <DM6PR02MB69246F1F3C0FD404763D3762C3809@DM6PR02MB6924.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.33)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/sfjAzFQT-vyF7axJFLlpxofSuYE>
Subject: Re: [homenet] agenda planning
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 19:29:25 -0000
On Feb 23, 2021, at 2:20 PM, STARK, BARBARA H <bs7652@att.com> wrote: > draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation-12 and draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-08 were posted towards the end of last year. There was some discussion on the list. We'll put them on the agenda; but we also want to discuss how best to progress them -- ensuring they get the review they deserve. > > Ted L: You had said maybe wanting to talk about stub resolvers. Do you still want time for that? Stub networks, not stub resolvers. Yes, I would like time for that. The relevant drafts are: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lemon-stub-networks/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lemon-stub-networks/> and https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lemon-stub-networks-ps/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lemon-stub-networks-ps/> Weirdly, I submitted a -01 for the problem statement draft prior to the deadline last night, but it doesn’t seem to have been published.
- [homenet] agenda planning STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [homenet] agenda planning Ted Lemon