IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] On renumbering [was: Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?]

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Thu, 16 October 2014 07:29 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075381A037A for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 00:29:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.967
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.967 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, PLING_QUERY=0.994, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yjW-fyWFXkye for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 00:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DB411A0369 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 00:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 33149A1; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 09:29:53 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1413444593; bh=kiLP7cG6BjuqsSUv1Xi9Nw9nfC4CyoxBek8x9UHBTjE=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=oE1LlT+3NC1MHoqr9Ay3aZSxS/IxqIIoERaEiibW+7gblym9jSu5lgjEoPGbri5ZN 04d45Ntmu3vEAY1kQN2hzUIw4TRTuaKiYx3G5HY8e9LP5O/xindL/dQKDmx/fKnxhj NCKc9Ho9yIOM8J9w7PZQQ2TWWfi8aXiCWddAlRFQ=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 270C59F; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 09:29:53 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 09:29:53 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <543EC77B.9090605@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410160927450.30853@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <72CC13D1-7E7A-4421-B23E-16D8FFAEEB58@darou.fr> <CAAedzxp1R-C5E9RJVMVLRJxPc0w4zooPtqnvWK9eggpZu4=xtg@mail.gmail.com> <C7F3DE60-F596-4BAD-9C28-74006966E5B9@fugue.com> <20141014142746.GX31092@Space.Net> <69B1F2CB-88C6-4211-83F3-11C8A3E7BFD2@fugue.com> <20141014145930.GY31092@Space.Net> <7D59D80C-2BF0-428B-A872-B2922B2D0F98@fugue.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410142043200.30853@uplift.swm.pp.se> <48942796-C098-48B6-B894-544499EEB5F3@fugue.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410150657030.30853@uplift.swm.pp.se> <5E43B678-A2F9-4289-93E9-A6A98BEE82A1@iki.fi> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410151112180.30853@uplift.swm.pp.se> <543EC77B.9090605@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/svIHUlTP3gX788AkNg33Z_FFVBw
Cc: HOMENET Working Group <homenet@ietf.org>, Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: [homenet] On renumbering [was: Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?]
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 07:29:58 -0000

On Thu, 16 Oct 2014, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> Shim6 is unfortunately broken, until the day when all middleboxes allow 
> the extension headers to pass, which is far from true today. MPTCP only 
> works for TCP. Mosh aparently only works for SSH. Happy eyeballs only 
> works for browsers. This is far from a closed topic.

Absolutely, there is a huge amount of work needed in this area. That's why 
I wrote "similar techniques".

> "Just"?? Anyway, see my rant in CCR:
> http://www.sigcomm.org/sites/default/files/ccr/papers/2014/April/0000000-0000008.pdf

Yes, I have read it and it's an excellent document I think is very 
valuable.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email