IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] New version draft-mglt-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-02.txt

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> Tue, 15 July 2014 18:35 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71BB41A0B13 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 11:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nq7ClOfLDqaC for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 11:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DEB11A0B04 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 11:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from potemkin.univ-paris7.fr (potemkin.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:1]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/46573) with ESMTP id s6FIYrH2004823 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 20:34:53 +0200
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by potemkin.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay2/46573) with ESMTP id s6FIYrNw006818 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 20:34:53 +0200
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94DAE2C4031 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 20:34:53 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id hTjuEHENBVCM for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 20:34:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ijon.pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr (unknown [78.194.40.74]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ACE642C4029 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 20:34:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from jch (uid 1000) (envelope-from jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr) id c002c9 by ijon.pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr (DragonFly Mail Agent v0.9); Tue, 15 Jul 2014 20:35:09 +0200
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 20:35:09 +0200
Message-ID: <87a98acvxe.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <7B5390DD-6969-4E26-A85E-0B436F48448F@fugue.com>
References: <CADZyTkk6rUuFJ5Wds2hioBBQa9-kXDJxyg_gBGQ1R6u5CHF2Ww@mail.gmail.com> <87fvij5wdw.wl.jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CADZyTkk2bv7T-Bs_ckG4i2MpXVDRqLA2R1dQgrMVrPSckOy-GQ@mail.gmail.com> <87k37uy703.wl.jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CADZyTk=YgD=JtyDpEz8TXOQmHxKzBoiEZbbW0LhZQy2GaKLqZQ@mail.gmail.com> <87vbrcydr9.wl.jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CADZyTk=kST4zPaPzz4DsAcCOtmYbQo-s2du+nEvJv0MSrneEMg@mail.gmail.com> <CADZyTkmZ+rC99qeC7gFEwc4JBoX9sHBUpo7p89+VC6zY7Z8drQ@mail.gmail.com> <87d2dfb98w.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CADZyTk=U25=Yck8BL5nrzGAR7mPk5HWp0r0h2wYy5ruSOf6rsQ@mail.gmail.com> <87vbr6mv8t.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <7EEF5CD0-C3B8-4559-A75D-E55931F94F61@iki.fi> <21162.1405438875@sandelman.ca> <7ioawqpqcv.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <7B5390DD-6969-4E26-A85E-0B436F48448F@fugue.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]); Tue, 15 Jul 2014 20:34:53 +0200 (CEST)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (potemkin.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.141]); Tue, 15 Jul 2014 20:34:53 +0200 (CEST)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 53C5744D.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-Miltered: at potemkin with ID 53C5744D.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 53C5744D.000 from potemkin.univ-paris7.fr/potemkin.univ-paris7.fr/null/potemkin.univ-paris7.fr/<jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 53C5744D.000 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 53C5744D.000 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 53C5744D.000 on potemkin.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/tmR6-sBAitvw_wWANxpuS9rbhxw
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>, Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [homenet] New version draft-mglt-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-02.txt
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 18:35:01 -0000

> I assume you mean that we need to recommend a default policy and also
> document the range of other policies that the end user might choose to
> use.

No, I just mean that Markus not wanting anything published in DNS is
policy, and that's completely independent of whether we want to define
a mechanism.  I have no opinion on either point.

All I know is that if we want to define a mechanism, then the mechanism
should be compatible with the worldview of HNCP, which includes things
such as multiple internal links and multiple CPEs.

-- Juliusz

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email