IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] {Sender Address Possibly Forged} WGLC (again) on draft-ietf-homenet-arch

Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk> Wed, 09 July 2014 15:46 UTC

Return-Path: <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 336B81A0AFD for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 08:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.951
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.951 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FgC6EhduWKdO for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 08:46:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.nominet.org.uk (mail.nominet.org.uk [213.248.242.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 359C71A0AFF for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 08:46:38 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: s=main2.dk.nominet.selector; d=nominet.org.uk; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:X-IPAS-Result:Received:Received:From:To: Subject:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID: References:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language:Content-Language: X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip: Content-Type:Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version; b=bcesRVjvTB8frMXUcj29rygsWbPz6bAhqAL8nOAWAOhMlXZVcOLFNnRT n388QHghnLqFeVgkdyoX6QFQ6WDIKMDhaVfZ9tjeFxnZh05S5vNrZoPBU TMl8iT5YvgmLmytPJXkRG8+janPUHCjCMhhdj/+FVEHRkvXK1+HJ0P382 mbvieC8nxwnVvlNGKWGCkYKQ7h/MCuMdM/xWb/38ZlxWaokU2fOxpAAMH JVO4EP3vfwEjP0ZB2jQ45EXWGG1z2;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nominet.org.uk; i=@nominet.org.uk; q=dns/txt; s=main2.dkim.nominet.selector; t=1404920798; x=1436456798; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=8IZUnhGvy4/f4wZApe1OhupT6guu0nrjTP/lAG3DOuM=; b=MYLwSYTbZdYJKhnCxdJhk4/+3nRDPXTQ2gw1gGDgTwkFkLJf8jAHiIQN BK7S/8g+ZalVP7saGP/qHoJ7DqY6hFFsLjXIAHlLqOU55QzPSF1o/ZS97 fS3qAmAc2ME6KJWTSPOHsvIBvMN3gInOWbAkT3ipgnrHn+b9J8FLXU+Bu YMZnK+D8Ze3JVZLHqWr0yqi/9iyw22sUILfh6BBvq2lKxDRMVNFa4KoLH +7mthFZchmhZW2g4Hl5ZNPxfdExSE;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,631,1400022000"; d="scan'208";a="10603091"
X-IPAS-Result: As8EAN9ivVPV+MWRdGdsb2JhbABZgmqBUMZeAYEQFg8BDFmEAwEBBAFTKwsCAQhGMiUCBBOIOgkDyRUXjw86gy2BFgWxA4FCgjA
Received: from wds-exc2.okna.nominet.org.uk ([213.248.197.145]) by mx2.nominet.org.uk with ESMTP; 09 Jul 2014 16:46:37 +0100
Received: from WDS-EXC1.okna.nominet.org.uk ([fe80::1593:1394:a91f:8f5f]) by wds-exc2.okna.nominet.org.uk ([fe80::7577:eaca:5241:25d4%16]) with mapi id 14.03.0181.006; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 16:46:36 +0100
From: Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk>
To: "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: {Sender Address Possibly Forged} [homenet] WGLC (again) on draft-ietf-homenet-arch
Thread-Index: AQHPm4s5+3DYJVuju0q+tiR98vBFv5uX0hQA
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 15:46:36 +0000
Message-ID: <2099BE2A-33EA-4DCC-B8C1-2A16F13E0620@nominet.org.uk>
References: <E24A8D97-B290-4501-9FC6-C6C820229C34@nominum.com> <98FCD1E7-0211-4569-ABDA-039A18893FDA@nominet.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <98FCD1E7-0211-4569-ABDA-039A18893FDA@nominet.org.uk>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.2.1]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <E6F2795A0FA7E94E960E098946BE936D@okna.nominet.org.uk>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/tuoXpvIzR7fL3yeW-8o_VZ54BHk
Subject: Re: [homenet] {Sender Address Possibly Forged} WGLC (again) on draft-ietf-homenet-arch
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 15:46:41 -0000

On 9 Jul 2014, at 16:34, Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk> wrote:

> As with the previous WGLC (albeit that was effectively immediately rendered moot by the WG’s unanimous rejection of the routing text that WGLC is the changes to section 3.5.

Sorry, that final paragraph should have read:

As with the previous WGLC (albeit that was effectively immediately rendered moot by the WG’s unanimous rejection of the routing text that came from the last IESG review) the only text that is in scope of this WGLC is the changes to section 3.5.

Ray

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email