IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Principles doc

Ray Hunter <v6ops@globis.net> Tue, 17 June 2014 18:03 UTC

Return-Path: <v6ops@globis.net>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3082F1A0111 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0ob2xpqsfPbC for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from globis01.globis.net (mail.globis.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f15:62e::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC431A00FF for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by globis01.globis.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A603871518; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:03:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from globis01.globis.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.globis.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3CcbPSEiVCnj; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:03:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Rays-iMac.local (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f15:73a:9414:31c6:b314:6aa4]) (Authenticated sender: Ray.Hunter@globis.net) by globis01.globis.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A98387005A; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:03:11 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <53A082D0.2070008@globis.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:02:56 +0200
From: Ray Hunter <v6ops@globis.net>
User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.11 (Macintosh/20140602)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <BEB843C7-EB1D-486A-A9A1-B99D48775D33@nominet.org.uk> <85F978F4-1293-4F9E-B5C7-068F95A0B626@nominet.org.uk> <CAKD1Yr2mzZOvCDwyyEZHef1rk5PAxtNZRVRys43SXnD=gVxLBA@mail.gmail.com> <143C7553-11D4-41A9-910E-FAD26F484635@fugue.com> <CAKD1Yr0hr8Pa_QU_9mjRjbxffQ=mdgOWYSQUyLc5ewkpuf5OmA@mail.gmail.com> <F08A2136-E88F-4785-BE01-14D386B9C2D9@fugue.com> <CAKD1Yr1nhnvG2H_9eeW-Dono3cZqYaxMZaCR1vcueOQgW4xqYQ@mail.gmail.com> <E66DDB31-C318-4025-BF8A-15F2336A2A08@fugue.com> <B289FE60-E0C7-4D3B-BE21-3C7109FAC69C@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|c9eee95ab0d06c016200d4557ca869f9q5CFPa03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|B289FE60-E0C7-4D3B-BE21-3C7109FAC69C@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <539C51BA.6030901@globis.net> <D13CB985-10CE-4F84-8780-C8B89B3BAF4C@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|48657d37f8f6efe84fde27a1620f4c22q5GHBd03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|D13CB985-10CE-4F84-8780-C8B89B3BAF4C@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <EMEW3|48657d37f8f6efe84fde27a1620f4c22q5GHBd03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|D13CB985-10CE-4F84-8780-C8B89B3BAF4C@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/ulKTx6c01q3hD5XrVT3hPD1BgXo
Cc: Bellis Ray <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk>, "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Principles doc
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 18:03:14 -0000

> Tim Chown <mailto:tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
> 17 June 2014 18:11
> Hi Ray,
>
> I like your questions, and I think many of your own suggested answers 
> to your questions are in line with what I believe the WG has assumed 
> in its discussions. I find myself in agreement with most (and perhaps 
> all) of them.
Glad to read that.
>  But obviously I can’t speak for the WG, only my perception of WG 
> consensus as the document editor.
I certainly don't claim to speak for the WG : I just hope my 
contribution moves the discussion on in a constructive way.
>
> I would say we did shy away from a specific answer on a separate 
> configuration protocol in London, but since then HNCP has evolved.
ACK.
> I agree the multi-path clarification is needed.
ACK.
>
> I think Alex is heading into too much detail, when we are trying to 
> avoid that (what Ray describes are general principles).
>
> I’m talking with Ted and the chairs on the approach to take.  Expect 
> news soon :)
Thanks.
>
> Tim
>
>
>

-- 
Regards,
RayH

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email