[homenet] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-homenet-dncp-11: (with COMMENT)
"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Mon, 19 October 2015 21:02 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietf.org
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89521ACE4C; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 14:02:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.6.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20151019210235.5064.58378.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 14:02:35 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/w-KbAEIw_qzScqk2MrcxFo8lr9U>
Cc: homenet-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-homenet-dncp@ietf.org, homenet@ietf.org, mark@townsley.net
Subject: [homenet] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-homenet-dncp-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 21:02:35 -0000
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-homenet-dncp-11: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-homenet-dncp/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Update: The new version made some changes to appendix B, but at least for the transport security section, it's not clear to me if this means the _section_ is optional or that _transport_security_ is optional. If the former, then I'm concerned people may take that as a license not to think about transport security requirements. Would it make sense to make the section required, even if took the form of "This profile does not require transport security because of <reasons>"? Previous comment: Thanks for the new appendix B. How should we interpret the "(optional)" tag on some of the sections of that appendix? For example, does for the Transport Security section, does (optional) mean the section is optional, that transport security is optional, or both?
- [homenet] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ie… Ben Campbell