[homenet] IPv6 Prefix delegation on IETF network, please ?

Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com> Mon, 02 November 2015 05:52 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F2E1B47B8; Sun, 1 Nov 2015 21:52:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tx5Ba9Ns2lzL; Sun, 1 Nov 2015 21:52:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB5111B47B7; Sun, 1 Nov 2015 21:52:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=707; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1446443522; x=1447653122; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=EY52XRM1iu5FlfAQ01ToBXI4q2ZZz2xKmzrn0ybvL78=; b=mlz3lASlL6Z9EZxHYxQWh7rxSJgHdNVo1avNfSues4GUi+7ovQ1g7OEs fIwI/YryQgxsBrN9TXPEPGq5CJIFVgYnQ0yvGl0BAf8plPputSBOlD4TP /LdQ9SiJ/AJhGy/4wPQuY95YSvyno6Ordm4lOrdUOqasVk73ZLaPP2GPH U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DyAQCX+TZW/4UNJK1egzu8W4QhAQ2BWodDOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEdjRHNAVJAYhCwSgBAQEBAQUBAQEBAQEBARuVNQWOEYgyjR0IgVmEP5YiHwEBQoIRHYF3HYYyAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,233,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="45924535"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Nov 2015 05:52:01 +0000
Received: from mcast-linux1.cisco.com (mcast-linux1.cisco.com [172.27.244.121]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tA25q1Kg012619 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 2 Nov 2015 05:52:01 GMT
Received: from mcast-linux1.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by mcast-linux1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id tA25q1fq007393; Sun, 1 Nov 2015 21:52:01 -0800
Received: (from eckert@localhost) by mcast-linux1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id tA25q080007392; Sun, 1 Nov 2015 21:52:00 -0800
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2015 21:52:00 -0800
From: Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com>
To: "94attendees@ietf.org" <94attendees@ietf.org>, homenet@ietf.org, hackathon@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20151102055200.GI31730@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/w2pClxcFgeLZZhB5AvcEIKziArU>
Subject: [homenet] IPv6 Prefix delegation on IETF network, please ?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 05:52:04 -0000

Thought maybe other folks beside me would chime in maybe help to ask for this for IETF95:

I was trying to play around with Homenet/OpenWrt during the hackathon and could not
nicely build out Homenet connection to the Internet because my internet provider
of choice (IETF ;-) did not offer IPv6 prefix delegation on its network.

I opened a case with the NOC but only got a thank you, can't do this time, case
closed back. Which i perfectly understand.

but if maybe more folks are interested to use/experiement (for whatever reason),
then maybe there would be sufficient motivation to do it next time...

Let me know if there is a better mailing list to ask for this.

Thanks!
    Toerless