Re: [homenet] Homenet Naming Architecture
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 21 January 2016 19:06 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310041A8A98 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 11:06:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, GB_I_LETTER=-2, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ooeF7pgU5TLc for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 11:06:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x234.google.com (mail-pf0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00FFF1A8A94 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 11:06:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id q63so28844167pfb.1 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 11:06:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=S/D5ML14fTloHEtLYHrn234+lSpNPCPTC1ufOuXHdIg=; b=M7l7vLzeYOWM/eCqT/NhTjK5E6fJlWJaTyd1tFdrLO0uXkl6tXaZdd9OkneklfX+Jo JChk7HwnLRG9bs9eJ12TceSxJv7O7AJj840juoXRi0RM6VZzSN64/5s4w5Yf69n0tuKY nWZ5dm1oVokmGjR11x1C1exHbtovF/4fjnzg843fCLtbAntmAh1DRjfc2g3ETZeIk7s3 gd30nY0eqJObBeDiyq02Im70ESE24t9BslGS7INF7MbCSpEowsrw20MiaJ5HulmNQtv0 xNWgGb7MILdAkuGraQWdyEOv+DD8NNlhQFV2KdLPZcG+7AiG8Lu3fH6ST00j6Kdpk3cF WsTA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=S/D5ML14fTloHEtLYHrn234+lSpNPCPTC1ufOuXHdIg=; b=KVSHhidRfvvD2yK71ClXnghK2+Kd4H96fZoLpl8cdpKd7Z2yx2WfsWoNRmoJdb1Cid YvPg+pBkrdLebPxq/xNjy6zCKQwkcjQMcIgGUuSG4AblLu1RlrOL5r+1UwxfHyC4QHb6 vdPxxPnw8M6Jdm8kIGe7dR9r78gokP2S7tMPQkP/vxUA2lHRGN2+W6yJOq5cBsywRK5E 57i3PEULpSu2BYABLJHZo6w6rHGFTHdqPPn11kti9KuWZn5jsPn/mP1xGpPlweW21CWP /fL9gRcKatR0PSMYperkbQjawybF/3ziY/XfExTE6tCgoSMq2/WUHIu2LnDqWWNMd/Qt 0inw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkb9T4xOiSBnW9iJmvceu7oPV3h5llEEDMZBq30YWP8OVsAP8G6ePbjQFMHf3qLOlN+QIKD3vkrln8nrh51b/Ry8ep2NA==
X-Received: by 10.98.66.77 with SMTP id p74mr63513801pfa.43.1453403215448; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 11:06:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:6d38:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:6d38:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 89sm4382889pfi.2.2016.01.21.11.06.52 for <homenet@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 21 Jan 2016 11:06:54 -0800 (PST)
To: homenet@ietf.org
References: <568B88E1.9040000@bellis.me.uk> <569D7FF6.1090109@gmail.com> <2D432DA4-F6A2-4BF4-953A-8D28AD7BFD92@gmail.com> <569FF7F6.20800@gmail.com> <CAPt1N1mZ-19+NxnD91XEpc_X49KxTCtv0gzmgXKQ0yBmAr0MBg@mail.gmail.com> <56A06E41.7010408@gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <56A12C55.5060707@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 08:07:01 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56A06E41.7010408@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/wfSusbTv0Rb0qbHYqwU28a7ydK0>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Homenet Naming Architecture
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 19:06:57 -0000
On 21/01/2016 18:36, Douglas Otis wrote:
...
> The TLD '.lo' looks somewhat like a ccTLD
AFAIK, two letter TLDs are all implicitly reserved since any of them might
pop up in ISO 3166 in the future. I'm not enough of an ICANNologist to
point to where this is established (to my surprise, it is not established
by RFC 1591).
LO is currently unassigned in ISO 3166, but of course that could change
as a result of some future geopolitical event.
So it would be really foolish of the IETF to consider .lo at all.
Brian
- Re: [homenet] Homenet Naming Architecture Douglas Otis
- Re: [homenet] Homenet Naming Architecture Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [homenet] Homenet Naming Architecture Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [homenet] Homenet Naming Architecture Douglas Otis
- Re: [homenet] Homenet Naming Architecture Douglas Otis
- Re: [homenet] Homenet Naming Architecture Brian E Carpenter