Re: [homenet] DNCP/HNCP Revisited

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 18 September 2019 23:30 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 269801200B5 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:30:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O68qcabB-nC0 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:30:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72d.google.com (mail-qk1-x72d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DD1812008F for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:30:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72d.google.com with SMTP id 201so1291908qkd.13 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:30:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=Yu+DdLZ961puUuBr+6GA6rdrKBsxQx3phChQobj8lI0=; b=y7CH4CRVwocQ3oa0bjm/QA8a7r8kbrBgZBIUX9idrAvSOEP/8EzvWzUhTUiivd5pDY pTvZta5t+GX1SN6fDFeRUxUcsTeNSu9p1O+r3mOZN3mK0ymxJcmDTQHm7LOn+kaifZ5x VOx4lcqkDrezdSZ7waWRD8GdUWOKLJQ3hm2e56LXpvHyKnrhPRTjD/ujo4MOXOGyzJ8S sJWtTi5QyM0yDkSUiki/Agd0lfUF3bjnnBbUAmiPyJKdc1uFIRlqASnNCFHYFHfqWp1q rjyvGxpybgFXj3XctODSUpgIqLm6vqmwORCodQ31kokogwkj0Xat5mOmWWJ7vizSAy/s xd8A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=Yu+DdLZ961puUuBr+6GA6rdrKBsxQx3phChQobj8lI0=; b=NpjvsogXeX1t3vatAw+mApufuLuJp8P/RTXdW7+c60nVjjAT0TpTra49WiQ2/BamE8 8IXhgpy/BkNu9gqxQ3uFmNzItPbsWkaRren3iSLmuFO2t/yFA1cbkJLgjz93U8M/NEHC 2YCo2DpcURGUuqjYENM5n3x4hQkUwFrg/ZM0h8+YiwB53suUY7KLHRv+rF1Z3ZoDbPf2 zJtgUDdP8dBW3m8W1ZSvniWbjhgyiZuTmKLFunS8MBRRbu50T/FiUKWRG02uoA4j4VmR Se4BYxMioRnysdrE775YoacjZfZQhNoTpIylvIb326vmIpMl/Bmr4nWjmGzMTjLUyq+j BloA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVGBvxTOl+wQ8TdBczt3LKZa8QjYkRPYUWnN7wg7bdQMKTqeeuh qn74AzlaMauicxBLdQLbHS0R2Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxnU32Q/GUI2zRkMQCm0j4/I/agl/rTOVH1NsedVf6VPENE6YbFlfUi+Vq+ay0JNVAnL3EXlA==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:660e:: with SMTP id a14mr22639qkc.481.1568849441260; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:30:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.100.56] (c-73-186-137-119.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.186.137.119]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j80sm3451782qke.94.2019.09.18.16.30.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:30:40 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 19:30:40 -0400
Message-Id: <A17EE006-1CFF-4B3C-9D2A-12BE3FACD703@fugue.com>
References: <877e65b3rd.wl-jch@irif.fr>
Cc: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>, "Ray Hunter (v6ops)" <v6ops@globis.net>, HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <877e65b3rd.wl-jch@irif.fr>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17A837)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/xXmfsn9Qi2CFCIXpaLFpPFNSJlo>
Subject: Re: [homenet] DNCP/HNCP Revisited
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 23:30:44 -0000

This still doesn’t address the problem that the HNCP packet needs to be fragmented. Fragmented Multicast doesn’t scale well. 

> On Sep 18, 2019, at 19:09, Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> wrote:
> 
> 
>> 
>> If you have a discontinuous L2 MTU, you do not need fragmented packets
>> to see packets disappear.
> 
> Ah, I see.
> 
>> No fragmentation of any sort involved, just incorrectly set up L2 segments.
> 
> Right.  It's an incorrect network setup.
> 
> To fix that, it should be enough to point the tunnel directly at a Homenet
> router rather than relying on bridging.  (A good idea in any case, since
> Babel is able to make better routing decisions if the tunnel is directly
> visible to it.)
> 
> -- Juliusz
> 
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet