Re: [homenet] auto-passthrough from ISP routers

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 24 July 2020 11:08 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E45F3A0EE4 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 04:08:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kLPr028ZS8KU for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 04:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x735.google.com (mail-qk1-x735.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::735]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25BE43A0ED7 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 04:08:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x735.google.com with SMTP id g26so8241459qka.3 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 04:08:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=jK3u9Ww1khwxM8iHWpn0gjloNUpjpWzlFM51VQNQi8M=; b=BgZu32+aP9qmbOUgtjfj+P3mIm0Ubx1EwLTKjluLq7Z9U2wdQpjVF+7Cv2H7VffGjN 0HFzUNWhPWGTAQ4DzwyBPAHjm8o/u6GYN5plhdFbjHNE4QA2F+0+HXQeUs/196sLgew3 rxMMXCuuVxfu4VS5iB1hfM3p8bPHx1DKKnVBte/xaI2+5RJSZpyFBqO/KR+HhDc4fYXD lt/BKMQxrat9QSipiwuW5GjcKeSP35KmVTjvk3dFLSwVOm5DktQurpVk8sLWnZ0z8x+P KDSfTLykZ2ubbDnaEue9oM2TxQ9ZhcqmH1Ps2HJiy651mehpV0xACS99pnYXgKnnksqm Fu7Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=jK3u9Ww1khwxM8iHWpn0gjloNUpjpWzlFM51VQNQi8M=; b=BsubCeBCw3HGxjNVuqbvl8mzlkYcf7vbfi75DG0bMnKPv+sWLlXis1fuXqS2fG+6dW T7D474NOmEy0zwkbMR+Kh7QUdAT1qgRjqtw9RwI5Z89mKKJDbnw3r5TQ0jTtSQBodMdy MM77stff/+l31S4eaUIXSXAboDGNShAbywuTIm7MH1gI/82h1WxK+nGYOg44klIc2skN 5Gowbd8JpzY4iF5LJ5GZbtRF0N84bcxiPzwmkP3CsoaiSLOUT/2NqfDtryp/UjX2bYdM DIbQz9as1cEURExivvajOPALAqoj5utvDfRwM73igTyAnKyxJGVxzFu1XoJJUrFljfX8 Kfiw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532vskP3Hl3evnzwYHoPqkJ9le48fFbBJTujtXTlXBixvcSXsG8U 3yq9NoQK+86Mu+gFUUQ1FHFh0w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxTwElHYIpgpoY+eq9eIHwLiQGrQ5pd0lOWHbv/6Xxvotujw9NcHcaN2csShA2/HTDaJIeo3g==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:414e:: with SMTP id k14mr1307217qko.374.1595588917084; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 04:08:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([2601:18b:300:36ee:ed08:9354:1a40:a5d7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b125sm6023564qkf.71.2020.07.24.04.08.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 04:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 07:08:35 -0400
Message-Id: <1AE664A3-1FCA-4F40-B34D-E8B46C615823@fugue.com>
References: <ACFFD80D-6CF1-46BC-BFC8-001259D481C9@employees.org>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Ray Bellis <homenet@ietf.org>, Barbara H Stark <bs7652@att.com>
In-Reply-To: <ACFFD80D-6CF1-46BC-BFC8-001259D481C9@employees.org>
To: otroan@employees.org
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18A339)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/xklLiJV6oII2XamqyiDFhMZ26do>
Subject: Re: [homenet] auto-passthrough from ISP routers
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:08:40 -0000

On Jul 24, 2020, at 07:04, otroan@employees.org wrote:
>>> 
>>> Cause it's architecturally "challenged"?
>> 
>> The working group or the solution?
> 
> Not sure how you could interpret that as pointing to the working group.
> 
> The solution obviously.
> IPv4 "pass through" implies sharing the IPv4 address among multiple nodes.
> Creating all sorts of tricky problems.
> Which of the nodes gets an ICMP error message for example.

Thanks for clarifying. It really was ambiguous and I really was confused—sorry!