Re: [homenet] Status of draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming CFA

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 16 August 2017 21:49 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90254132725 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:49:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NMBrxLWazz-J for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:49:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22e.google.com (mail-pg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5B01132031 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:49:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id i12so29304700pgr.3 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:49:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qahR3isQroc9Q325peEUF3p4crOhc8hQrlv0G0kSz28=; b=CiDFAcfK15grOuVDbsvjdP0Pa6KoIeu6U8Au2RpZn7lv8TPLNrO/+S2SQqTbe+lcZx FXvLP38Wq4tXiyyKDqrJbkZ+M5siMwxw403PlGAbH2uEy5OB3JT4UZzgaUsId7gMAyoz SSeu3qGj+hxfm2kb8arfaWl152zEVbMWd/9ESMw8LF73tRc7alvEvHf1oveCx6BDKVKZ IZyDRFnVFJaXkprbC/06wFazNKvZN/Lns5wNkYsONUC0Sn1Q6Odb9405d2PCZsgqXtvr W7j7Sp7MHrITQzd5LKOIDOIhj7jKlUcu7WTItOAV/bNC//XgAMg6J1d75WkcQxQM1xfJ z/7Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qahR3isQroc9Q325peEUF3p4crOhc8hQrlv0G0kSz28=; b=K6e6V1V1FwPlpfujd/pdXTQKavb8+89Hzsa7lMf0qjszoBNn0GLGn+GsMwyaMh9291 hyIedgnF3Hghi1c65SY+A0WZ1HBgHDRLyM06Afj5niecN7CKpGl5qEKBDiGAL3Eyp/YD 12dg0JjHE3KfOqm2bEfImdmZuRWSjM3/+nkfixVqthNvLzkUfZkEoVNE2FPSRPOWqTwM h/u4j2J3aZEeci3S/iryYlr7EoUBkux4j+p7LopO2yPvpRTeumYsYEGSsc1GUVf4Jg8W 8xsjC4gOIwnEwddbho3oPezq4gKAmK+9oOA7UOawvIV8+w8mkA4YSx45e8Axy6chkb05 jvWQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5hJ+AdKEedkBHbBvjSLs5NlLU8PBI0AKcJI7t8O/HfV7ReE1iCo 5IZd6iOXNqPyOZuuHuO00FdrR/BY7heW
X-Received: by 10.99.56.68 with SMTP id h4mr2912692pgn.52.1502920195383; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:49:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.142.144 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.142.144 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87k223jjdg.wl-jch@irif.fr>
References: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DBF5904@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <877eyaz2jm.fsf@toke.dk> <CAPt1N1m5nVGD-y2VrbkoTEPTs4qF98oRxGuvd-Has1yzuS0fmg@mail.gmail.com> <874ltez1wg.fsf@toke.dk> <7E8390B5-9048-4783-B17F-6C9EA5610887@fugue.com> <7ivalujdfu.wl-jch@irif.fr> <15F1CE39-82EE-4B0D-A31B-2C1805991541@fugue.com> <871sofzqma.fsf@toke.dk> <CAPt1N1=oiU+DbjD6izOBNJOnC25d=-S3ARqFxydRfWLEet5mEQ@mail.gmail.com> <87valry4o7.fsf@toke.dk> <FCAD81FA-BBA0-45B0-8F1F-D1D5FD010484@fugue.com> <87shgvxybl.fsf@toke.dk> <4AF8CF8A-F781-449F-9C53-A9603889746E@fugue.com> <87lgmnxr3u.fsf@toke.dk> <E3E75086-BF36-4F59-86BD-7FFDAFE772AB@fugue.com> <87fuctxdrc.fsf@toke.dk> <FB44A942-9DE3-4CE6-88C5-402B20756462@fugue.com> <877ey4y62g.fsf@toke.dk> <6DF8489E-D780-4E4C-A132-31EEF8285BB7@fugue.com> <874lt8xv9j.fsf@toke.dk> <3DE50D7C-53BF-4758-8DED-A2CA89C8ABE7@fugue.com> <871soby776.fsf@toke.dk> <769C4508-BB58-4BCB-A3CE-3657FB43A8AA@fugue.com> <87k223jjdg.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:49:54 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1=rb-pvddpEDWD9AscGTs=TsU5bo7tywn9Gj1tsSdAZKQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
Cc: HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045d33f25f39520556e5e0fe"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/xo6zO-262X6VBLGBBieQZB4yLKE>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Status of draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming CFA
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 21:49:58 -0000

It's never for that purpose. It's to combine to normal connections so as to
increase reliability. The scenario you just described would require a
wormhole with one end in the 1990s.

On Aug 16, 2017 5:25 PM, "Juliusz Chroboczek" <jch@irif.fr> wrote:

> > I think this is a real edge case. You have two connections, the DNS
> server on
> > one of them is broken, the DNS server on the other is not, but the second
> > connection performs so much worse than the first
>
> That's exactly the kind of situation that we'd like Homenet to work well
> in.  Connection A is a 1.5Mbit/s leased line, it's rock solid, and has
> rock solid infrastructure behind it.  Connection B is consumer FTTH at
> 1Gbit/s, it's flaky, and it's backed by infrastructure that works on
> Mondays only.
>
> Quite frankly, if it's not for combining fast with reliable, I just don't
> see what's the purpose of having multiple connections.
>
> -- Juliusz
>