Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?

Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi> Tue, 14 October 2014 08:25 UTC

Return-Path: <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6C51A6FD1 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 01:25:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.387
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.387 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, PLING_QUERY=0.994, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_RHS_DOB=1.514] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yIZBhthV9-sO for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 01:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jenni1.inet.fi (mta-out1.inet.fi [62.71.2.197]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A2951A6FCD for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 01:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from poro.lan (80.220.64.126) by jenni1.inet.fi (8.5.142.08) (authenticated as stenma-47) id 5419499102516763; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 11:24:58 +0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410141020360.30853@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 11:24:57 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C52D3324-3015-45E0-88CF-D2A778D246B8@iki.fi>
References: <72CC13D1-7E7A-4421-B23E-16D8FFAEEB58@darou.fr> <CAAedzxp1R-C5E9RJVMVLRJxPc0w4zooPtqnvWK9eggpZu4=xtg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410141020360.30853@uplift.swm.pp.se>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/yQ2_iOgm3wwVIdUyFLYL_9PTtIo
Cc: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>, HOMENET Working Group <homenet@ietf.org>, Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>, Pierre Pfister <pierre.pfister@darou.fr>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 08:25:06 -0000

On 14.10.2014, at 11.21, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2014, Erik Kline wrote:
>> I vote no, please don't make it MUST.
> I agree, ULA should be optional, not MUST.

If we live in the land where we ignore existing broken implementations..

From my point of view, it should be SHOULD _always_ generate ULA (so that privacy oriented things in a home have a sane default without need for trusting firewalling), and MUST generate if no GUA around.

Keeping GUA around as long as it has valid lease lifetime is fine too, of course.

Cheers,

-Markus