HELP!
braden@isi.edu Mon, 09 August 1993 12:23 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00910; 9 Aug 93 8:23 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id ae00886; 9 Aug 93 8:23 EDT
Received: from venera.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16904; 7 Aug 93 17:06 EDT
Received: from can.isi.edu by venera.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-12) id <AA18255>; Sat, 7 Aug 1993 13:54:39 -0700
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 1993 13:54:45 -0700
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: braden@isi.edu
Posted-Date: Sat, 7 Aug 1993 13:54:45 -0700
Message-Id: <199308072054.AA28328@can.isi.edu>
Received: by can.isi.edu (5.65c/4.0.3-4) id <AA28328>; Sat, 7 Aug 1993 13:54:45 -0700
To: ietf-hosts@isi.edu
Subject: HELP!
Friends, Recently a member of this community, call him joe@zilch.edu, sent out an email message that included at the end a copy of a message I had sent to the IETF list. Joe's message had the following form (doctored only to protect Joe's identify): From ietf-request@ietf.cnri.reston.va.us Fri Aug 6 13:40:50 1993 Resent-Message-Id: <199308062040.AA25892@venera.isi.edu> Resent-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 93 14:21:26 EDT Resent-From: Joe@zilch.edu Resent-To: ietf@CNRI.Reston.VA.US ate: Fri, 6 Aug 1993 10:28:16 -0700 Sender:ietf-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US Sender: ietf-request@msu.edu From: braden@ISI.EDU To: yakov@watson.ibm.com, craig@aland.bbn.com Subject: Internet growth models Cc: ietf@CNRI.Reston.VA.US Content-Length: 2344 X-Lines: 46 <Joe's message> <A copy of the body of my message> My name was in the FROM field (and my Sun mailer thought the message was from me)! When I protested to Joe that he was improperly pretending to be me, he said, ... "I use Rice Mail and the Columbia Mailer. They've behaved this way for years. I am not an email guru, and since you're at ISI you're a lot closer to the gurus than I am -- perhaps you are considered one yourself -- but I seriously doubt that either of these is not conforming to RFC822. The Resent-From field is what I've always seen as the name of the forwarder, not the original sender. "Resent-from" is a real RFC 822 field: resent-authentic = = "Resent-From" ":" mailbox This is often a source of confusion for mailing list users, when their software honors the "Sender" field on a reply, but in 8 years of sending mail exactly the way I did this time -- forwarding a quote to a mailing list -- I've never run into this sort of flak. I cannot answer for what your "mailer" is doing. I think you mean your mail program (message user agent), not your mailer (message transfer agent), but please tell me how the behavior of Rice Mail or the Columbia Mailer doesn't conform to RFC822." ------ Note that he DID NOT just forward ("resend") my message, he wrote his own message and appended the text of my message. Isn't this wierd? If so, how can it have gone unnoticed for so long? Bob Braden
- HELP! braden
- Re: HELP! Erik Naggum
- Mail and Resent-fields (was: Re: HELP!) John C Klensin
- Re: Mail and Resent-fields (was: Re: HELP!) Dave Crocker