Re- TCP broadcast storm
Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com> Thu, 11 November 1993 05:23 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa29818; 11 Nov 93 0:23 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa29814; 11 Nov 93 0:23 EST
Received: from venera.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05397; 11 Nov 93 0:23 EST
Received: from qualcomm.com (wizard-gw.qualcomm.com) by venera.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-14) id <AA14057>; Wed, 10 Nov 1993 21:17:15 -0800
Received: from servo.qualcomm.com by qualcomm.com; id AA04183 sendmail 5.65/QC-main-2.1a via SMTP Wed, 10 Nov 93 21:17:04 -0800 for postel@ISI.EDU
Received: by servo; id AA07783 sendmail 5.67/QC-subsidiary-2.1 Wed, 10 Nov 93 21:17:02 -0800 for braden@ISI.EDU
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1993 21:17:02 -0800
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>
Message-Id: <9311110517.AA07783@servo>
To: postel@isi.edu
Cc: braden@isi.edu, ietf-hosts@isi.edu, TCP-Group@ucsd.edu, MGauthier@iit.nrc.ca
In-Reply-To: Jon Postel's message of Mon, 8 Nov 1993 08:43:10 -0800 <199311081643.AA24710@zephyr.isi.edu>
Subject: Re- TCP broadcast storm
This confusion between the Internet itself and the hosts attached to it continues. Last week, during the Houston IETF, the New York Times carried an article titled "Traffic Jams on the Information Highway" (or words to that effect, this is from memory). The article was clearly about the extreme loads that certain popular *server machines* on the net have been experiencing, but the title metaphor obviously gives the (mis)impression that the NSF backbone communication links are overloaded. As far as I have been able to observe, they are not. Phil
- Re: Re- TCP broadcast storm Bob Braden
- Re: Re- TCP broadcast storm Jon Postel
- Re: Re- TCP broadcast storm Bob Braden
- Re: Re- TCP broadcast storm Jon Postel
- Re- TCP broadcast storm Phil Karn
- Re: Re- TCP broadcast storm Bob Braden