Re: RFC 1123 and SMTP
Paul Mockapetris <pvm@isi.edu> Fri, 06 November 1992 23:21 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10544; 6 Nov 92 18:21 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10540; 6 Nov 92 18:21 EST
Received: from NNSC.NSF.NET by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21093; 6 Nov 92 18:21 EST
Received: from nnsc.nsf.net by NNSC.NSF.NET id aa18330; 6 Nov 92 18:19 EST
Received: from venera.isi.edu by NNSC.NSF.NET id aa18326; 6 Nov 92 18:18 EST
Received: from LOCALHOST by venera.isi.edu (5.65c/5.65+local-6) id <AA23874>; Fri, 6 Nov 1992 15:19:20 -0800
Message-Id: <199211062319.AA23874@venera.isi.edu>
To: Bob Braden <braden@isi.edu>
Cc: KLENSIN@infoods.mit.edu, G.Michaelson@cc.uq.oz.au, ietf-hosts@nnsc.nsf.net
Reply-To: pvm@isi.edu
Subject: Re: RFC 1123 and SMTP
In-Reply-To: Your message of Fri, 06 Nov 92 12:55:31 -0800. <199211062055.AA02912@zephyr.isi.edu>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1992 15:19:17 -0800
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Paul Mockapetris <pvm@isi.edu>
> > > > John, > > Thanks for supplying your usual combination of grace and > precision in answering these questions. > > I say, "People who don't send Date: or From: fields are BOZOS!" > > Bob > This of course brings to mind the question of the use of the term "BOZO" in technical specifications. At a certain government meeting, I said: "If we do both X and Y, we look like BOZOs" The particular choice of X and Y don't really matter here, but this was a joint UK/US activity, so there was a question about whether BOZO is a US-centric way of looking at things. While we never reached worldwide closure, BOZO is understood in both the GB and UK context. The meeting continued after I left, and someone raised the question of whether my statement was equivalent to saying "I won't do both X and Y" A split decision followed! So the point of this story is that if you want people who are BOZOs to do something, calling them BOZOs won't work, they will want to do it anyway. paul P.S. Sorry, it is late on Friday here...
- Re: RFC 1123 and SMTP Bob Braden
- Re: RFC 1123 and SMTP John C Klensin
- Re: RFC 1123 and SMTP Bob Braden
- Re: RFC 1123 and SMTP Bob Braden
- Re: RFC 1123 and SMTP George Michaelson
- Re: RFC 1123 and SMTP Paul Mockapetris