Re: [HR-rt] Check in on process

[Mallory Knodel <[e-mail]>]

Thanks Gurshabad,

On 22/05/2019 11:39, Gurshabad Grover wrote:
> On 14/05/19 4:12 PM, Mallory Knodel wrote:
>> Maybe Gurshabad could speak to how we can collectively feed into the
>> guidelines draft.
>>
> 
> I think what you've suggested here (quote below) is great:
> 
>> On the wider process, I think people in HRPC who are using RFC 8280 to
>> guide their reviews could:
>>
>>  * Send a message to HRPC about drafts that might be interesting because
>> of a) clear connection to RFC 8280, b) requests from authors or
>> engagement with RFC 8280 in the I-D drafting process, or c) existence of
>> a human rights considerations section in an I-D.
>>
>>  * CCing HRPC if someone in HRPC conducts a review and cites RFC 8280,
>>
>>  * Discussion on the list and in meetings about learnings gleaned from
>> the review process when using RFC 8280 or the guidelines draft.
>>
> 
> Maybe we can send this text to the hrpc list if and when we close down
> the hr-rt list?

I'll wait a bit longer if anyone has some riffs on what I've written.

> Also, we're using this pad to keep track of RFCs/IDs with a "human
> rights considerations" section:
> https://etherpad.net/p/Overview_of_human_rights_considerationse
> Will be good to hear people's thoughts on how they're drafted and how we
> can improve guidelines documents.

We had a Gitlab at some point, but it wasn't used much. Should we also
shut that down and try to migrate the most important bits into the pad?

Should we use etherpad.ietf.org?

-Mallory

-- 
Mallory Knodel
Head of Digital :: article19.org
gpg fingerprint :: E3EB 63E0 65A3 B240 BCD9  B071 0C32 A271 BD3C C780