[HT-rt] [iesg-secretary@ietf.org: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-04.txt> (Padding Policy for EDNS(0)) to Experimental RFC]

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Mon, 26 March 2018 14:00 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: hr-rt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hr-rt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE871127522 for <hr-rt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 07:00:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M0VeZN9NwB1s for <hr-rt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 07:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69189127419 for <hr-rt@irtf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 07:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id B1800280101 for <hr-rt@irtf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 16:00:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 500) id AA0E82802B2; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 16:00:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay01.prive.nic.fr (relay01.prive.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:15::11]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2979280101 for <hr-rt@irtf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 16:00:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.users.prive.nic.fr [10.10.86.133]) by relay01.prive.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F356663E731 for <hr-rt@irtf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 16:00:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 98FA441249; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 16:00:04 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 16:00:04 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: hr-rt@irtf.org
Message-ID: <20180326140004.7fi2qfspxt2e5xtg@nic.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="ep6tefjsum6iwuwv"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 9.3
X-Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-6-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.2
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2018.3.26.135417
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hr-rt/Ip_FC1Q-wRkbQ0xc3STCFur4pgA>
Subject: [HT-rt] [iesg-secretary@ietf.org: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-04.txt> (Padding Policy for EDNS(0)) to Experimental RFC]
X-BeenThere: hr-rt@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Human Rights Protocol Considerations Review Team <hr-rt.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hr-rt>, <mailto:hr-rt-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hr-rt/>
List-Post: <mailto:hr-rt@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hr-rt-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hr-rt>, <mailto:hr-rt-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:00:14 -0000

Keywords : privacy, anonymity, so may be interesting.
--- Begin Message ---
The IESG has received a request from the DNS PRIVate Exchange WG (dprive) to
consider the following document: - 'Padding Policy for EDNS(0)'
  <draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-04.txt> as Experimental RFC

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2018-04-04. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of
the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


   RFC 7830 specifies the EDNS(0) 'Padding' option, but does not specify
   the actual padding length for specific applications.  This memo lists
   the possible options ("Padding Policies"), discusses implications of
   each of these options, and provides a recommended (experimental)
   option.




The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy/ballot/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.



--- End Message ---