Re: [HT-rt] [EXTERNAL] Re: HR-RT Review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sat, 21 April 2018 03:19 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hr-rt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hr-rt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7EA212D7F7 for <hr-rt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Apr 2018 20:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, GB_AFFORDABLE=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gUXW_jpFWxOG for <hr-rt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Apr 2018 20:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl0-x22d.google.com (mail-pl0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 660941270A0 for <hr-rt@irtf.org>; Fri, 20 Apr 2018 20:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id f7-v6so6232439plr.4 for <hr-rt@irtf.org>; Fri, 20 Apr 2018 20:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XQln8ssWWe1HydXne7N+B43kDnTX0UNec0Y8lSaWZ1c=; b=WH5+NxMlyV9CY3vF7lJCxIors3T0WIosbSWQzQeAbdjmFoTx0sgM+No0NXvFdOW3ce uVwwnhTSqjPH8jFVOF87X6eSxsxFEYs8178o42kamQqG2LQBgL146lDjh18S+rFIMqfB M5DVHai4IrXbvbb4nKv0kSXbvBFnsg7GsMj8LgFHZpU7dM0fNZiICWvRFFXocPOOswbs VLRJv7MttNO4sblE8tI6o7KYz2TqahMgEu7PF7QCPFRgM7pcA4CKPAIPS7mCBlI6rRA2 xaYrnl83J9U45eYliAJeeFN9GzZbcTJ0HI71HFf8JO7PWkjpD6EhkfUhKCv1TfY0DUpQ 4Aog==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XQln8ssWWe1HydXne7N+B43kDnTX0UNec0Y8lSaWZ1c=; b=HNmv3Rg9dDxVa+TZ87vD7tCzL9+deu1iWJNM6IoWFGYXbsnN2xFG3ZN885QOR/uHJ6 30ukRsqyFs2yblrAMEVEronoq9YIROV4Gt8UvNITldEHjdZmhwrKtpUQEjKv0HqUMlme /WJDcwUYip5bl3hssUZ6ft+dotZ6DDp6k8MrIBScg7SV8FZYE/dN7Pz1NZpKgoumg6ng yF9I6Yj4RShGVtOZA6fx+UnoGCzkng/Pcj8KfxaMMjXkikAL04/wgmrfY0DYrYm6R61a P9YNDVj7pjPczTXE8r7W2YzQTjBMEzMp+KjrwdTJYGuy01VGG6kT+QECK3E4HECqPhQy LX4g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tB84tIe6b1h2bt34nLHvzk445HrLcV5xrSKLO2oY8WhHznY5ghg 4wC4LucFVfXD0fq9zOC+06U=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx49oItc/+AZkQ+E/seD7hCWESQ/jKjN0TaK3m3/zo0EWoaBJi+XRwjjbeVn08XqQO4Amu6Vknw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8f86:: with SMTP id z6-v6mr12591063plo.316.1524280763271; Fri, 20 Apr 2018 20:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.26] ([118.149.104.73]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l129sm10346038pgl.89.2018.04.20.20.19.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 20 Apr 2018 20:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Brian Carpenter <becarpenter46@gmail.com>
To: "Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)" <Glenn.Deen@nbcuni.com>, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, Niels ten Oever <lists@digitaldissidents.org>
Cc: "hr-rt@irtf.org" <hr-rt@irtf.org>, "draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <d0739bb2-626e-8aa3-f22f-d51b07dfdacf@digitaldissidents.org> <21952.1524157167@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <7B17FF2E-4393-4644-998B-16462F71A00F@qti.qualcomm.com> <22946590-de79-a2ab-9cf8-be9bcec50b73@cisco.com> <2F97BE9D-2EC3-499E-BDD4-7B9A05DB77D4@nbcuni.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <12e7f4b8-969c-535c-23dc-d922d78b0bb6@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2018 15:19:29 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2F97BE9D-2EC3-499E-BDD4-7B9A05DB77D4@nbcuni.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hr-rt/J2RzEPzcwoxn_v57l8z08XuX8kA>
Subject: Re: [HT-rt] [EXTERNAL] Re: HR-RT Review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process
X-BeenThere: hr-rt@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Human Rights Protocol Considerations Review Team <hr-rt.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hr-rt>, <mailto:hr-rt-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hr-rt/>
List-Post: <mailto:hr-rt@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hr-rt-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hr-rt>, <mailto:hr-rt-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2018 03:19:26 -0000

Glenn,

On 21/04/2018 10:53, Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal) wrote:
...
>               <t>The cost of guest rooms, meeting space, meeting food and beverage
>                 is affordable, within the norms of business travel,    and 
>                  there are at least some inexpensive and safe
>                 alternative  accommodations within easy reach to the Facility
> 
> [GD]  This is too vague to properly evaluable against and is why the business-travel norms was used.    There are guidelines for business travel costs that are available that can guide evaluation of the criteria.   However, terms like "inexpensive" , "safe" are very subjective and are not practical to evaluate against when testing the criteria in the document.

The fact is that some people find the typical "official" IETF hotel rates
exceed their budget. Try "substantially cheaper than the cheapest official
hotel". I think IASA has enough common sense to know what "substantially"
means.

IASA surely already has to check the general safety of the area around the venue,
and in any case the cheaper hotels need to be reasonably close. We already have
text as follows:

   o  The Facility environs include budget hotels within convenient
      travel time, cost, and effort.

Maybe that's enough. It excludes isolated out-of-town venues and the like.

... 
> 
> [GD] The document is criteria used by IASA to vet a venue against, not a wish list to communicate to venues.  I do not wish to undermine aspirations, but this document is not the place to capture them.  It's used as an evaluation list IASA vet a venue against to determine if the venue meets the needs of the IETF community to meet at.   Putting it in the document does not serve to communicate the aspirations to the venue as we are not handing the document to the venues being evaluated.

If the aspirations are clearly identified as such, I can't see any harm in
including them. IASA will use the hard criteria for evaluation, and may use
the aspirations for background.

    Brian