Re: [HR-rt] [hrpc] [regext] Human Rights Review of draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode
bzs@theworld.com Fri, 05 October 2018 01:50 UTC
Return-Path: <bzs@theworld.com>
X-Original-To: hr-rt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hr-rt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60ADB1292F1 for <hr-rt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 18:50:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.577
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.577 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id STyBzzxkIxVV for <hr-rt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 18:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls6.std.com [192.74.137.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AA7F12F295 for <hr-rt@irtf.org>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 18:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pcls8.std.com (pcls8.std.com [192.74.137.148]) by TheWorld.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w951l9nM001336; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 21:47:12 -0400
Received: from pcls8 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pcls8.std.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w951l7QT031008; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 21:47:08 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <23478.49819.848846.8971@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 21:47:07 -0400
From: bzs@theworld.com
To: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
Cc: Niels ten Oever <lists@digitaldissidents.org>, "Gould, James" <jgould=40verisign.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, hr-rt@irtf.org, hrpc@irtf.org, regext@ietf.org, gurshabad@cis-india.org
In-Reply-To: <321916997.13308.1538579123709@appsuite.open-xchange.com>
References: <EE368E9F-E08F-4960-BC0D-88B94D66EF02@verisign.com> <20181003134215.GA23633@mir> <321916997.13308.1538579123709@appsuite.open-xchange.com>
X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.3.1 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hr-rt/WSRBxBT8MjNSGdnO-BVM9Jn9z3U>
Subject: Re: [HR-rt] [hrpc] [regext] Human Rights Review of draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode
X-BeenThere: hr-rt@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Human Rights Protocol Considerations Review Team <hr-rt.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hr-rt>, <mailto:hr-rt-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hr-rt/>
List-Post: <mailto:hr-rt@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hr-rt-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hr-rt>, <mailto:hr-rt-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2018 01:50:14 -0000
Re: tagging discussion I don't see content tagging as only negative. I could imagine such a facility being used positively such as tagging some content as "child friendly". Which is why my interest in the topic is more in mechanism than policy. One would still have to trust the source of the tag, reputational issues, which remain a largely unsolved problem on the net. For example attempts at attaching reputation to DKIM (et al) which I know was a hope for DKIM. Merely knowing it came from who it claims to have come from is really only half the battle, it might be bona-fide mail from an evil party. It's a potentially huge topic, perhaps it needs a tag! -- -Barry Shein Software Tool & Die | bzs@TheWorld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD | 800-THE-WRLD The World: Since 1989 | A Public Information Utility | *oo*
- [HR-rt] Human Rights Review of draft-ietf-regext-… Gurshabad Grover
- Re: [HR-rt] [regext] Human Rights Review of draft… Gould, James
- Re: [HR-rt] [regext] Human Rights Review of draft… Niels ten Oever
- Re: [HR-rt] [hrpc] [regext] Human Rights Review o… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [HR-rt] [regext] [hrpc] Human Rights Review o… Ulrich Wisser
- Re: [HR-rt] [regext] [hrpc] Human Rights Review o… Erwin Lansing
- Re: [HR-rt] [regext] [hrpc] Human Rights Review o… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [HR-rt] [regext] Human Rights Review of draft… Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [HR-rt] [regext] Human Rights Review of draft… Niels ten Oever
- Re: [HR-rt] [regext] Human Rights Review of draft… Gould, James
- Re: [HR-rt] [regext] Human Rights Review of draft… Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [HR-rt] [hrpc] [regext] Human Rights Review o… bzs
- Re: [HR-rt] [regext] Human Rights Review of draft… Klaus Malorny
- Re: [HR-rt] [regext] Human Rights Review of draft… Niels ten Oever
- Re: [HR-rt] [regext] Human Rights Review of draft… Peter Koch
- Re: [HR-rt] [regext] Human Rights Review of draft… Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [HR-rt] [hrpc] [regext] Human Rights Review o… Eliot Lear
- Re: [HR-rt] [regext] Human Rights Review of draft… Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [HR-rt] [hrpc] [regext] Human Rights Review o… Niels ten Oever
- Re: [HR-rt] [regext] Human Rights Review of draft… Niels ten Oever
- Re: [HR-rt] [regext] Human Rights Review of draft… Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [HR-rt] [hrpc] [regext] Human Rights Review o… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [HR-rt] [hrpc] [regext] Human Rights Review o… Niels ten Oever
- Re: [HR-rt] [hrpc] [regext] Human Rights Review o… Eliot Lear
- Re: [HR-rt] [hrpc] [regext] Human Rights Review o… Eliot Lear
- Re: [HR-rt] [hrpc] [regext] Human Rights Review o… Niels ten Oever
- Re: [HR-rt] [regext] Human Rights Review of draft… Gurshabad Grover
- Re: [HR-rt] [regext] Human Rights Review of draft… Gould, James