Re: [HR-rt] [hrpc] Internet Architecture Board warns Australian encryption-busting laws could fragment the internet

Mark Perkins <marknoumea@yahoo.com> Sun, 04 November 2018 05:27 UTC

Return-Path: <marknoumea@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: hr-rt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hr-rt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B73B2130DD7 for <hr-rt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 22:27:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DrlKTlK35ZY1 for <hr-rt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 22:27:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sonic317-29.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com (sonic317-29.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com [74.6.129.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0522130DD5 for <hr-rt@irtf.org>; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 22:27:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1541309246; bh=FdzSiwqQcxmjFfHQQcQj/WxS6GYyF/yNWR4Rnd3ne/w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=OoBjZrNISV0GjzE+7MMjodQDodVidIdhotr4bTO+NbE0qLKygf4VqR3UJcQ8QBqomQxpJfgljr420X743M40DW2uUMJTghSlCfIM72Ikg8Pbr0TS/1UwMwoGPYguG23CfxURk0jgmxDfAmm6sQCcORgW7d+tN1Is/GNascr52gHywLwupfX9jRsAKHg0PjQ8Jdm+F4Z+z39xSyPIsVtjicpg+IVenEAYhI7BX171t936MckGkrvpVxS5nSBKjdL3shyjDMqBI7XwCLbd/cAk2Ic3Spc57mIXmeu5R3/D+kXhe2EL+ISkg5Mocorv1evNXV2WHj1A9dvHqA0D7XsbPA==
X-YMail-OSG: z6cyH6oVM1lgTkMoSFXWEeef1vku4rehlEbQGoFv0TZ5hlpQj7V.3pZqw_Qjx_u BffnrPwsKJ3MdILeR4ishoGDuIkHLpiw._rdVzTZQlCwAZYik3ma6QbMwNo633ycc_Ds_xBOleeX ZcerV3GtL0soE_5IyBf_VBiaSBNKZp1ZxQ6zrnZmiCFgSu9noOBtDKZi6pxqVzvuyMOc17S_GmO6 fI0gChbbzOMTejhuT87QcFTZEnds6hw.Mg6SQfFpOoPKPsNSqx6eW2Vh0Ow891_slTxgSwdIv3X4 oRBsvokGHXwnOFRxHNPUIfbU3uNhxjTRrHTyf.cBagdvz7hscfUFbKQldFYZrbdHwxHVc1u5GUfR HmheIPVx_4KpjA3s.kExWXWgCS4kkwX6RRi.oEHEBSjpEt_3c3iJvBkSGIZI4QjuIuv5bg6SOUOT nH5FKe8XhVAiZKzLsYgKspdyJBPWRZOCutb5JDZhL4G2TTAT_aXsir7hnS7p40NjbWZBQRv3GXdT ds_dQ8_qyxRvDcoXgG5_tT9mdfV.aeOT6D84waWXKOvr3ziQTrANlFTElPe2euZNjq3zr_Fe6FIe 6zkm3YQCZOEH973kDJb71DYAI1A0V8AR136BCEVRUK8ZOH0uabFKyCvsdBuIfImP76WtPDhUeWs1 JpqHyKDyzuKyySlYPR6EHa3a2OothFYoGJkJetnMg4AWhJtOKCl20fLGwEHi54okIXmuA0mWFfmL MddNB72ceXnw73gDIKBGHlgbjJxfMqh3bRsGTRHMj7v.qEUI_CT8owp5z7e5g3YrzU0JRSbBp6bD xvYjQ_FybUF_QXPw8mPH7Uh6t6imAYSmBjenYaiJV_9Gn_pXY3J82g.C6DrA8XE2RG88cqg_xJSm I0nUYQR1a9K9fBawvXh_8La5OSF3DDEFxMOg_yADZ7NbbyOui_cBAnRB5W.4zSKvRjDeaAEn61fC kQeMxo70ExDKsHfzAfD.ZFezq3s5aGkYCoJ4URrY3A7xFeQ.RbvYLzWrpwu2fpvZewTHgYqBC4wa gHsXQG2tVJWF6bjWFj4IEh3bxYFhn8rMaCtAzbmstZoNq7KT.sfpE12elRHPBKpZKNAkOW6nx4.U oV96eK7Xf9y8ziipWNgiEP.zNocfHZK_TDFJF.baBL8Lk3w2h9SQWdOv0
Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic317.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sun, 4 Nov 2018 05:27:26 +0000
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2018 05:27:22 +0000 (UTC)
From: Mark Perkins <marknoumea@yahoo.com>
To: Mark Perkins <marknoumea=40yahoo.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, <bzs@theworld.com>
Cc: Hr-rt <hr-rt@irtf.org>, Hrpc <hrpc@irtf.org>
Message-ID: <1384177593.21911021.1541309242022@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <23518.22393.46237.953386@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
References: <1419803954.21799255.1541280743505.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1419803954.21799255.1541280743505@mail.yahoo.com> <23518.22393.46237.953386@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_21911020_1425689451.1541309242019"
X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.12512 YMailNorrin Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:63.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/63.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hr-rt/r7DtzkrlzTrPLZ0JTXggn-LE2ec>
Subject: Re: [HR-rt] [hrpc] Internet Architecture Board warns Australian encryption-busting laws could fragment the internet
X-BeenThere: hr-rt@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Human Rights Protocol Considerations Review Team <hr-rt.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hr-rt>, <mailto:hr-rt-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hr-rt/>
List-Post: <mailto:hr-rt@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hr-rt-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hr-rt>, <mailto:hr-rt-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2018 05:27:32 -0000

 BarryWith a bit of digging into the announcement (with help from Google Translate), it sems that Denmark is making existing recommendations obligatory. The existing recommendations seem to be:
"What type should we use?

As mentioned in the section on rights and obligations above, it is always the data controller who, based on his risk assessment, must assess the level of security that is appropriate. Accordingly, according to the Data Inspectorate, there would be types of processing where encryption on the transport layer is appropriate and there will be types of treatment where - due to the high risk of the data subjects - the more secure end-to-end encryption will be appropriate. This could be the case, for example, if a data controller, such as an insurance company, has to send health information about a large number of registrants to a data broker for sending letters. In that case, on the basis of a risk assessment, the data controller may decide that end-to-end encryption will be an appropriate security measure. Due to ongoing collaboration with the data processor, the two parties have exchanged S / MIME certificates, so they can send e-mails back and forth to each other, which is end-to-end encrypted."
<https://www.datatilsynet.dk/emner/persondatasikkerhed/transmission-af-personoplysninger-via-e-mail/>

Mark P.



    On Sunday, November 4, 2018, 1:32:18 PM GMT+11, <bzs@theworld.com>; wrote:  
 
 
And Denmark will require "email encryption" as of 1/1/2019 or in
European format 1/1/2019.

  https://litmus.com/blog/beyond-gdpr-denmark-makes-email-encryption-mandatory

This has all become a massive buzzword cargo cult with
legislators...they can manage to send/receive stuff on their phone so
surely they are expert in how it all works.

Apparently Denmark's legislation has chosen to omit the details of
what they mean by encryption of emails (end to end? transport? other?)

But the article linked below is your usual fantasy legislation.

Why not just make cancer illegal? Millions suffer and die from cancer
and it costs many billions to treat, we need a law!

On November 3, 2018 at 21:32 marknoumea=40yahoo.com@dmarc.ietf.org (Mark Perkins) wrote:
 > Not sure if people had seen this news
 > 
 > Internet Architecture Board warns Australian encryption-busting laws could
 > fragment the internet
 > 
 > https://www.zdnet.com/article/
 > internet-architecture-board-warns-australian-encryption-busting-laws-could-fragment-the-internet
 > /
 > 
 > Mark P.
 > _______________________________________________
 > hrpc mailing list
 > hrpc@irtf.org
 > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc

-- 
        -Barry Shein

Software Tool & Die    | bzs@TheWorld.com            | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD      | 800-THE-WRLD
The World: Since 1989  | A Public Information Utility | *oo*

_______________________________________________
hrpc mailing list
hrpc@irtf.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc