Re: [HR-rt] Check in on process

[Melinda Shore <[e-mail]>]

On 5/13/19 2:03 AM, Mallory Knodel wrote:
> Would it be better if the work to test IETF WG drafts against RFC 8280
> came back within the fold of HRPC? 

Thanks for bringing this up!  Bringing these discussions back
onto the main mailing list would expose the discussion to all
RG participants, which I think is critical for trying to get a
handle on how effective tools like RFC 8280 and draft-irtf-hrpc-guidelines
are for forming the basis for useful HR evaluations and for
writing HR considerations sections.  It seems to me that understanding
the applicability of the documents in practice is necessarily an
activity internal to the research group and that it would be
enormously valuable to fold the review discussions back into the
RG.  It's also the case that the existence of this mailing list
has led to some misunderstandings about the HR reviews themselves,
so there's value, I think, in removing any ambiguity around
that.

I'd love to see some discussion about metrics or criteria for
evaluating 8280 and the guidelines draft.  This is outside my
area of expertise but I do think it's part of our responsibility
as an RG to be able to make a statement about correctness.

Melinda

-- 
Melinda Shore
[e-mail]

Software longa, hardware brevis