IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hrpc] I-D Action: draft-irtf-hrpc-political-03.txt

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Fri, 12 July 2019 23:11 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8739512014E for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 16:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0VhiSIRA6dhp for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 16:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8229F1200DB for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 16:11:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5948; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1562973097; x=1564182697; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=Wt3PHZ23rBBFRlvwicicPoKVR76TqdEuEExpetwFdT0=; b=XJ7JnyCrxK/yh8EiAsOZ/n5hibJ+XFiqx87HnYvXl/lN0oG6tDZ/IJNq N7CU8GAHlATUVHAW8JJWtcjtrQS4xkTjyeJFOnDgDVV+fTQCRP0/D+Mgb MvQcdvJCuSrAXKUUsJ/G9hd3Cdy08olCNHBAW9UiNbQ9jSXERRnYhntlY Y=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 195
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AEAABcEild/xbLJq1lGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBUwUBAQEBCwGBFII9ASASKIQciBxfi3iHMotGhgKBewIHAQEBCQMBAS8BAYRAAoJ5NAkOAQMBAQQBAQIBBW2FSIVKAQEBAQIBI1YFCwsYKgICVwYTGYMJAYF7D6tegTKFR4RlEIE0AYFQiiWBf4E4H4JMPodOMoImBJRxlXEJghuCH4EMkGAbjTWKUqF2gwsCBAYFAhWBUDiBWDMaCBsVZQGCQT6QST0DMJBkAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.63,484,1557187200"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="14242010"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 12 Jul 2019 23:11:35 +0000
Received: from [10.61.168.132] ([10.61.168.132]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x6CNBY3U032661 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 12 Jul 2019 23:11:34 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <691E7168-F21A-444C-84C5-32E4D212816A@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5345E1F5-7779-4E57-A08A-59A97F0EAB56"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 01:11:33 +0200
In-Reply-To: <dc18973c-9749-35c6-4ea4-5fb89960a03c@nomountain.net>
Cc: hrpc@irtf.org
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>
References: <155810770809.26266.7969582032908863356@ietfa.amsl.com> <405bd4ae-1735-2ddb-d4af-a6314833537a@derechosdigitales.org> <98cc85cf-5c03-1e91-7fe0-746e1ad502e6@nielstenoever.net> <7B65EBFA-4EAA-4010-9D3F-9CC8805AF7D2@cisco.com> <adcd74fc-f536-d861-eb6f-fb0b7acd24ba@nielstenoever.net> <d89f14d5-a421-713e-b3f5-1fe475573fff@cs.tcd.ie> <964A7862-3550-43A5-A856-ABF831D2E5BA@cisco.com> <4aad3bb1-b1ab-c853-5e85-59e895ee3862@nomountain.net> <62203DE9-0F72-4525-9B07-ECB1ACA2AB70@cisco.com> <dc18973c-9749-35c6-4ea4-5fb89960a03c@nomountain.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.168.132, [10.61.168.132]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hrpc/1SDoVvyc1LbwDIKnTiDH6e-d6W4>
Subject: Re: [hrpc] I-D Action: draft-irtf-hrpc-political-03.txt
X-BeenThere: hrpc@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "mail@nielstenoever.net" <hrpc.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hrpc/>
List-Post: <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 23:11:40 -0000


> On 12 Jul 2019, at 21:35, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net> wrote:
> 
> I am not making that claim.  I am claiming that the question
> of meeting location is not the same question as whether or not
> someone is able to participate in the IETF standards process.
> 

But not on an even footing with those who can meet in person, and that was my point.  And by the way, how many people show up to our meetings outside of region is not a good measure of whether they would want to attend.

All of this is not to say that it’s the IETF’s lot in life to correct all such inequities.  I’m not suggesting that tomorrow we redo our meeting policy.  Some of this is surely beyond our means.  But that doesn’t mean there isn’t an HR impact.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email