Re: [hrpc] draft-irtf-hrpc-association-02
Mallory Knodel <mallory@article19.org> Mon, 20 May 2019 11:09 UTC
Return-Path: <mallory@article19.org>
X-Original-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C58120150 for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2019 04:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dwruMQ0_f6Sh for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2019 04:09:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smarthost1.greenhost.nl (smarthost1.greenhost.nl [195.190.28.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1704F12014F for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Mon, 20 May 2019 04:09:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.greenhost.nl ([213.108.110.112]) by smarthost1.greenhost.nl with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <mallory@article19.org>) id 1hSgAc-0005s6-GC for hrpc@irtf.org; Mon, 20 May 2019 13:09:31 +0200
To: hrpc@irtf.org
References: <e91dd252-6fcc-41c5-9077-b3934ddba7ea@avris-iPad> <CABtrr-U76xGXjiKW+DgpVkGU27B2Gb7YpZW-vBOSq-_R2XZRng@mail.gmail.com> <27c2964d-e533-9ea3-bacf-763afe9111ee@nielstenoever.net> <9b24f9c1-c8dc-16e2-ce3d-e1749828ddab@doria.org> <CABtrr-VK4ndYsS2990AmySwNSKjBbxBKLvk5hiAq4mp=8r=6-w@mail.gmail.com> <dad6b90a-dc88-3de3-2e8f-4981a279b86a@apc.org> <CANZrNV_w3gL0sPQO-9uF=gWthSLg4L8Q9U5=nyV1tTMAdy49Xw@mail.gmail.com> <563cc37d-eac1-1b20-bdb4-86a0dcd5e73d@apc.org> <CANZrNV_MZTpu+pUXkveGsyq0wLCt9hMi7b=7R6MA_5L5yJznsw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mallory Knodel <mallory@article19.org>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Autocrypt: addr=mallory@article19.org; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQENBEx0TWcBCAC8sirY3nlDnRwY6XWmsvZtM9kmEK6H8no3ZuQ723PKwHOddw1nOykh0in/ /QGRmwtyVzsfLh6/94UUZTn10oo+xGAfw2gf1on5IJTIiphykk732PNnUakVGWwHNKQquTVc kLrydUaFVMb89BAXqExBKlMg2ciEjzbYMCs3I/qZAZ0Wr5nF3RQS8O78elTNAgWTZ98yKTZV DlRoDpnvbfwtIPqnISoSjDEvEUBdpykvS3jHqlR1f6Mx6Xs97S5CORaer/0qTcDm0PAb1Z9l IhMsFl05tNt2FpgS4/RN8NyLasAQNOlScpTJbAfRuyyvRm1N8GLIL1KX+YYeLyqzhdhZABEB AAG0Jk1hbGxvcnkgS25vZGVsIDxtYWxsb3J5QGFydGljbGUxOS5vcmc+iQFWBBMBCABAAhsD BwsJCAcDAgEGFQgCCQoLBBYCAwECHgECF4AWIQTj62PgZaOyQLzZsHEMMqJxvTzHgAUCXH1h mgUJEepHrwAKCRAMMqJxvTzHgH3DCAC1sjJmg4+/VcESEzNkiF3KHEDCAssEaQl2FWfuXVvJ /mPliFtjpVv6EhdgUG5lbOcu12TCUWg42wHkE2kbDWXLE3f7HL+Nq0pEPVdMRXLxEfaOs2oR KGx8lh4k1UgYEpnARI486TklOAONKWdJKstEPrtt9LtysnjvhZvYCTzLKJC98c5wUvC46QYy +NdK6GB+uyVzW5kP2uUUBYxiCyHivGBbv77jcJAFVAk96ut1GFpeCCZM2WyYzer95b9n9a1B UGdJgEEVVbbBIQw7yMbMPqEwa8rpfig7QG72GieYItQjllHXGbOECiBcOHrGtrFWsHWxOxJV bZSoVq6sn1UUuQENBEx0TWcBCADiak/YuMW4BbaWL0U9sNg4zO3Qy1OFeye8fJjR8O/wWVSq cqA+sxjzRUee2fHCp6kVLedy6dVfiKmr59p21r4selOdslKaWmEGtz2oYnGpyPB/jKjfleE5 cIkXCdqgDAhfbfuVdF7heHpfhUy4m3yOJl2+CluT/CG9AfaCtyrwqMJzLWK4vmkGXxnBgb92 mGK0WFB2oRydz+SsiobgpCAqJSLcr8ZHQ54SbD9yxxYPv8IsSjt4eJoZCFI7INBsz4i7aj/q 4xcxQ+xiUwyqCZUvrzMxpw7c8TXuPHStDyhnsKkFjxhlY5avNeu0VPwk72C64I+y93gpPrL3 vL0tEmU9ABEBAAGJATwEGAECACYCGwwWIQTj62PgZaOyQLzZsHEMMqJxvTzHgAUCXH1hmgUJ EepHswAKCRAMMqJxvTzHgEDZCACcTamfNdBACpPHsmsJL1hbWertwYZg7h2rZtgmZQ9C2PMT OgkPPSsfi+xZ6PaXlvm2RI/TX51LbJsCJ9Fd2/WxKdtC0s6o7+0Cl3P57AORf3BRfl3zfXuy VhzjLvM9WhDiQM6JBqDuYxiYnjO56l+gozEuBAtUJaPIxGyggyS5eT8kKv8Szpc4g7/skZXq ccVOHj05KCOaFQ774rsIzcwppqJqGjh9X6nX6m2DONuBIYNXjH9U6FxHSJ6gRRxZkiz2/dDZ YqsHYlkKigH82r9gORhIGZkCd7xnRhyLOHnjjeKtIy5pvGwxUohy+y5l8i1155JEPNB7pphY xFxjMOQU
Message-ID: <c38a03cf-635e-0df6-f98b-01e07b90fcb0@article19.org>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 14:09:26 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CANZrNV_MZTpu+pUXkveGsyq0wLCt9hMi7b=7R6MA_5L5yJznsw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav at smarthost1.samage.net
X-Scan-Signature: 594d8924eb9d2e4af18bc4ea99181183
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hrpc/Ap8juTCTBXOGYifvy-GoakC2EZY>
Subject: Re: [hrpc] draft-irtf-hrpc-association-02
X-BeenThere: hrpc@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "mail@nielstenoever.net" <hrpc.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hrpc/>
List-Post: <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 11:09:37 -0000
Hi Stéphane and Joe, Thanks for volunteering to incorporate the feedback that has come through the list since the last version of this draft.[0] Can you give us, or me and Avri offlist, a sense of your timeline for another version? And reach out to me if I can give you access to the github group[1] so that you can track your changes. Thanks! -Mallory [0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-hrpc-association [1] https://github.com/IRTF-HRPC On 17/05/2019 18:21, Stéphane Couture wrote: > Hi all, > > > So, as I mentioned in my last email, I re-read the document and am now > sharing some comments. Forgive me if my style is too academic. > > > 1. As it was mentioned earlier (by Avri I think), I think the stated > goal of the document to "establish the causal link" is too strong. The > notion of "causality" usually refers to a quantitative approach (for > instance using regression analysis). The analysis provided in this > document is in my view fundamentally qualitative, and I do not see how > it can support a strong claim of causality. I also have to say that I > come from the field of Science and Technology Studies, where causal > relationships have been strongly debunked in favor of more complex > relationships, so I am a bit doubtful about the term here. > > > 2. The document is also saying that RFC8280, "established either causal > or deterministic relationships,” but I don't see mention of "causal" in > RFC820, but maybe I am wrong here. > > > 3. There are many places we go too quickly from "machine communication" > to "human communication,” and from "computing interoperability" to > "human association.” For instance, at the end of the paper, it is > written that "This lack of interoperation is harming the ability of > people to set or negotiate their own terms on which they would like to > assemble or associate.” However, many authors (and activists) are still > praising proprietary social media for their capacity to facilitate > assembly and collective action. And on the other hand, more > interoperable platforms sometime lack user-friendliness or a wider user > base to allow a wide range of people to participate. So, there might be > other variables than "interoperability" to take into account to see how > technologies facilitate association. > > > On this, I think the last sentence should be unfolded : > > > "The use of social-media platforms has enabled groups to associate, but > it has also rendered users unable to change platforms, therefore leading > to a sort of “forced association” that inhibits people to fully exercise > their freedom of assembly and association.” > > > What is a "forced association" ? Why is the inability to change > platforms necessarily "leading" to "forced association" ? If there is a > causal link to be made, I would think it is here. > > > 4. Concerning the flow of the argument, it would be good to explain how, > or why, each of these cases were chosen. It is stated that a "purposive > sampling approach, aimed at the typicality and paradigmatic nature of > the cases" was chosen, but I think there would be a need for better > explanation on the "typicality and paradigmatic nature" of each of the > cases. > > > 5. Again, on the flow of the argument, it would be good to add a > sentence at the end of each of the cases to explain how it is related to > freedom of association. For many of them, we have to guess it. > > > I also made some more specific comments in the document that I could > share for the rewriting the new version. > > > Best, > > > Stéphane > > > > Le jeu. 16 mai 2019 à 11:36, avri doria <avri@apc.org > <mailto:avri@apc.org>> a écrit : > > Hi, > > I think that sounds splendid. > > To both of you, please let Mallory and me know how we can help. > > thanks > > avri > > > On 16-May-19 11:05, Stéphane Couture wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Mallory have asked me recently to act as editor, as way to contribute > > to the group. I was hesitant to do it alone, but I'd be happy to be > > "co-traveler" on this, if Joseph and others agree. > > > > I also made comments on the draft, but for some reasons, my document > > didn't save, so I need to write them again. I'll send them asap. > > > > Best, > > > > Stéphane > > > > Le jeu. 16 mai 2019 à 10:50, avri doria <avri@apc.org > <mailto:avri@apc.org> > > <mailto:avri@apc.org <mailto:avri@apc.org>>> a écrit : > > > > Hi, > > > > Thank you. > > > > Any takers on the role of co-traveler? > > > > thanks > > > > avri > > > > > > On 16-May-19 09:19, Joseph Lorenzo Hall wrote: > > > I'm definitely interested in helping incorporate the flurry of > > > feedback this draft received before IETF 104. I would love a > > > co-traveler... > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 4:39 PM <avri@doria.org > <mailto:avri@doria.org> > > <mailto:avri@doria.org <mailto:avri@doria.org>> > > > <mailto:avri@doria.org <mailto:avri@doria.org> > <mailto:avri@doria.org <mailto:avri@doria..org>>>> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Thanks to you and to Gisela for taking the draft as far as > > it has > > > come. > > > > > > Mallory and I will discuss how best to continue with this > > draft. > > > Definitely interested in hearing from anyone who is > > interested in > > > being > > > part of an editorial effort to take it toward completion. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > avri > > > > > > > > > On 28-Mar-19 13:36, Niels ten Oever wrote: > > > > Thanks for all the great reviews and comments. It is > great to > > > see a lot of new energy on this draft. > > > > > > > > As mentioned, Gisela and I feel like we are not the best > > persons > > > to integrate the proposed changes, so we would like to take > > a step > > > back a lead authors and hope that others will step forward > > to take > > > the lead to take this RG document further. > > > > > > > > If there are no others who want to work as co-authors, > perhaps > > > the reviewers (and RG participants and others) could propose > > > alternate text either in attached markdown document, or > as pull > > > requests on github ( > > > > > > https://github.com/IRTF-HRPC/drafts/blob/master/draft-association.md > > > )? > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > > > Niels and Gisela > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > hrpc mailing list > > > hrpc@irtf.org <mailto:hrpc@irtf..org> > <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org>> <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org > <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org> > > <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org>>> > > > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc > <https://www.irtf..org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Joseph Lorenzo Hall > > > Chief Technologist, Center for Democracy & Technology > > > [https://www..cdt.org <http://cdt.org> <http://cdt.org> > <https://www.cdt.org>] > > > 1401 K ST NW STE 200, Washington DC 20005-3497 > > > e: joe@cdt.org <mailto:joe@cdt.org> <mailto:joe@cdt.org > <mailto:joe@cdt.org>> <mailto:joe@cdt.org <mailto:joe@cdt.org> > > <mailto:joe@cdt.org <mailto:joe@cdt.org>>>, p: 202.407.8825, pgp: > > > https://josephhall.org/gpg-key > > > Fingerprint: 3CA2 8D7B 9F6D DBD3 4B10 1607 5F86 6987 40A9 A871 > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > hrpc mailing list > > > hrpc@irtf.org <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org> <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org > <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org>> > > > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc > > > > _______________________________________________ > > hrpc mailing list > > hrpc@irtf.org <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org> <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org > <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org>> > > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc > > > > _______________________________________________ > hrpc mailing list > hrpc@irtf.org <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org> > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc > > > _______________________________________________ > hrpc mailing list > hrpc@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc > -- Mallory Knodel Head of Digital :: article19.org gpg fingerprint :: E3EB 63E0 65A3 B240 BCD9 B071 0C32 A271 BD3C C780
- Re: [hrpc] draft-irtf-hrpc-association-02 Niels ten Oever
- Re: [hrpc] draft-irtf-hrpc-association-02 Joseph Lorenzo Hall
- [hrpc] draft-irtf-hrpc-association-02 Avri
- Re: [hrpc] draft-irtf-hrpc-association-02 Mallory Knodel
- Re: [hrpc] draft-irtf-hrpc-association-02 Avri
- Re: [hrpc] draft-irtf-hrpc-association-02 Melinda Shore
- Re: [hrpc] draft-irtf-hrpc-association-02 Joseph Lorenzo Hall
- Re: [hrpc] draft-irtf-hrpc-association-02 Joseph Lorenzo Hall
- Re: [hrpc] draft-irtf-hrpc-association-02 Joseph Lorenzo Hall
- Re: [hrpc] draft-irtf-hrpc-association-02 Niels ten Oever
- Re: [hrpc] draft-irtf-hrpc-association-02 Gisela Perez de Acha Chavez
- Re: [hrpc] draft-irtf-hrpc-association-02 avri
- Re: [hrpc] draft-irtf-hrpc-association-02 Joseph Lorenzo Hall
- Re: [hrpc] draft-irtf-hrpc-association-02 avri doria
- Re: [hrpc] draft-irtf-hrpc-association-02 Stéphane Couture
- Re: [hrpc] draft-irtf-hrpc-association-02 avri doria
- Re: [hrpc] draft-irtf-hrpc-association-02 Stéphane Couture
- Re: [hrpc] draft-irtf-hrpc-association-02 Mallory Knodel