Re: [hrpc] [irsg] Submission of draft-irtf-research for IRSG last call.

[avri doria <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

Thank you for this review.

Niels, please let the HRPC group know about the disposition of these
suggestions.

thanks

avr





On 17-May-17 10:58, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> I am happy to be the second "Yes" for this document. I have a small
> list of minor issues from my review:
>
>
> At the end of 5.2.3.3.2 it says that there is no opportunistic
> encryption for HTTP/2: this is now RFC 8164!
>
> In 5.2.3.6.6: is "vanify" a word?
>
> In 6.2.5: first para has some questions duplicated (with minor
> differences). I think some cleanup is in order.
>
> In 6.2.8: freedom of expression is so good, it is listed twice ;-).
>
> In 6.2.10: last para on page 49 is almost the same as the first para
> on page 50.
>
> In 6.2.12: RFC 4646 got obsoleted by RFC 5646.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Alexey
>
>
> On 05/05/2017 15:09, Niels ten Oever wrote:
>> That would be awesome Alexey!
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Niels
>>
>> On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 06:07:50PM +0100, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>>> Hi Niels,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01/05/2017 21:11, Niels ten Oever wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> It's been three weeks since Avri forwarded this document to the
>>>> IRSG and
>>>> Stephen made the review and called it 'Ready to Publish'.
>>>>
>>>> Do we need more reviews before  a poll can be called?
>>> If I remember correctly you only need 1 Yes before progressing to
>>> IRSG poll.
>>>
>>>> Or would a second review be part of the poll itself?
>>> I think so. I can do the second review.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Alexey
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Niels (who as a co-author would be very happy if this process
>>>> progressed)
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 12, 2017, at 17:05, Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]
>>>> <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>      Dear IRSG,
>>>>
>>>>      I'm happy to volunteer to do an IRSG review of this one.
>>>>
>>>>      I reviewed the draft during the RG process and checked the
>>>> changes
>>>>      done since and I think this is ready for publication.
>>>>
>>>>      Cheers,
>>>>      S.
>>>>
>>>>      On 12/04/17 15:45, avri doria wrote:
>>>>
>>>>          Hi, As co-chair of the Human Rights Protocol Considerations
>>>>          (HRPC) Research Group (RG) and shepherd for this document, I
>>>>          would like to submit: Title : Research into Human Rights
>>>>          Protocol Considerations Authors : Niels ten Oever Corinne
>>>> Cath
>>>>          Filename : draft-irtf-hrpc-research-12.txt Pages : 75 Date :
>>>>          2017-04-10
>>>>         
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-hrpc-research/?include_text=1
>>>>          for IRSG Review and Approval (according to RFC5743, 2.2) The
>>>>          research in this draft has been a work item in the RG since
>>>>          mid 2015. Several earlier drafts were folded into this single
>>>>          draft, which became a RG draft in September 2016.
>>>>
>>>>              From the abstract: This draft has consensus for
>>>>              publication from the Internet Research Task Force (IRTF)
>>>>              Human Right Protocol Considerations Research Group. It is
>>>>              the first milestone in a longer term research effort and
>>>>              has been reviewed both within the research group and by
>>>>              individuals from outside the research group. Many of the
>>>>              topics discussed are still under discussion in the
>>>>              research group and will be subjects of continuing
>>>> research.
>>>>
>>>>          The RG held an extended last call, longer than a month, where
>>>>          we received comments from a number of RG members,
>>>> including by
>>>>          several experienced IETF participants and RFC authors, and
>>>>          also from some external academics and human rights advocates.
>>>>          The last call was follwed by a vigorous discussion in the RG
>>>>          to clarify and revise statements made in the draft. A revised
>>>>          document was subjected to a 2 week second last call as there
>>>>          had been substantive changes made in the draft after the
>>>> first
>>>>          last call. While some minor changes were made in the second
>>>>          last call draft, they were not substantive and did not
>>>> require
>>>>          another last call. I believe that this document meets the
>>>>          requirements for RG preparation defined in RFC5742 section
>>>>          2.1. and that is it ready for IRSG review, and hopefully
>>>>          approval. Thanks Avri Doria --- This email has been checked
>>>>          for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>>>          https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>>         
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>          hrpc mailing list [e-mail]
>>>>          https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>      hrpc mailing list
>>>>      [e-mail]
>>>>      https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc
>>>>
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus