IETF Logo Mail Archive

[hrpc] "Paul Vixie and Peter Lowe on Why DoH is Politically Motivated"

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Mon, 15 November 2021 12:18 UTC

Return-Path: <stephane@sources.org>
X-Original-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C415A3A0A3D for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 04:18:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qyNsqj4pnZMw for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 04:18:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ayla.bortzmeyer.org (ayla.bortzmeyer.org [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc0:41:216:3eff:fe27:3d3f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EA113A0A55 for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 04:18:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ayla.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 27AC5A024A; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 13:18:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail.sources.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 261B1C80EA; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 13:17:04 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 13:17:04 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: hrpc@irtf.org
Message-ID: <YZJPwEUqvCvCUVRz@sources.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 11.1
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hrpc/H_NBTJw4cSjduAtO18h3zGqvfBU>
Subject: [hrpc] "Paul Vixie and Peter Lowe on Why DoH is Politically Motivated"
X-BeenThere: hrpc@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: hrpc discussion list <hrpc.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hrpc/>
List-Post: <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 12:18:20 -0000

It's funny (no, actually, it's sad) that some people, in 2021, still
use "political" as an insult and criticizes a protocol as being
"political" (specially in the fields of security and privacy where
things are even more political than the average network protocol).

https://www.dnsfilter.com/blog/paul-vixie-and-peter-lowe-on-why-doh-is-politically-motivated

What do they think? That encryption can avoid political discussions?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email