Re: [hrpc] Protocol/Architecture consideration of Attribution & right of legal remedy (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-irtf-hrpc-guidelines-03.txt)

bzs@theworld.com Thu, 13 June 2019 17:39 UTC

Return-Path: <bzs@theworld.com>
X-Original-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBDB61201A3 for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 10:39:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.579
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.579 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E0p-nllfVBMv for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 10:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls6.std.com [192.74.137.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E386120046 for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 10:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pcls8.std.com (pcls8.std.com [192.74.137.148]) by TheWorld.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x5DHcjXO015507; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 13:38:47 -0400
Received: from pcls8 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pcls8.std.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x5DHcdwS007658; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 13:38:39 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <23810.35359.59791.395355@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 13:38:39 -0400
From: bzs@theworld.com
To: John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>
Cc: farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii@gmail.com>, Niels ten Oever <mail@nielstenoever.net>, hrpc@irtf.org, Amelia Andersdotter <amelia@article19.org>
In-Reply-To: <75BFC93D-8C5A-45C3-A68B-B3BBEF65390F@istaff.org>
References: <155989623088.20255.12181969220178709616@ietfa.amsl.com> <C550D5BC-8062-4C58-8CEC-B82B2798C1D9@istaff.org> <71b7350e-cb75-aba1-1717-50d1069531b1@nielstenoever.net> <B8D9823F-2D42-42DF-AE8A-6E67532DA4D1@istaff.org> <d66b60ab-3aaa-d45d-3f47-d2c00f89119d@article19.org> <1ECD44BA-4BB1-47FD-87B5-E35A3B6DDCB6@istaff.org> <CAN1qJvA5BdbSJNkGADChmtmjHzww0Q5RcvXwwOC4rO7YT7DiVw@mail.gmail.com> <992B79C0-5B80-4710-B8CF-D87BC80FA2C3@istaff.org> <CAN1qJvD+m+ecOWj8rY3v59u=qnxBH4zU8Z3G74R4tU38h6Eccg@mail.gmail.com> <75BFC93D-8C5A-45C3-A68B-B3BBEF65390F@istaff.org>
X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.3.1 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hrpc/LDxcO1qO1244dvhpHwSrZ2zwMLM>
Subject: Re: [hrpc] Protocol/Architecture consideration of Attribution & right of legal remedy (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-irtf-hrpc-guidelines-03.txt)
X-BeenThere: hrpc@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "mail@nielstenoever.net" <hrpc.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hrpc/>
List-Post: <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 17:39:17 -0000

When something like this comes up I tend to wait for someone with
legal training to chime in but it rarely happens. I guess such a
person needs a retainer first.

I have my doubts that a right to legal remedy, which is reasonable,
implies any particular set of a priori evidence capture rights.

My sense is this falls more in the regulatory arena, if anywhere.

-- 
        -Barry Shein

Software Tool & Die    | bzs@TheWorld.com             | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD       | 800-THE-WRLD
The World: Since 1989  | A Public Information Utility | *oo*