Re: [hrpc] re history lessons

Mallory Knodel <mknodel@cdt.org> Mon, 03 May 2021 14:54 UTC

Return-Path: <mknodel@cdt.org>
X-Original-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 944FC3A172E for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 May 2021 07:54:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cdt.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OHRWPhjK9TVC for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 May 2021 07:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x829.google.com (mail-qt1-x829.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::829]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF4763A1727 for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Mon, 3 May 2021 07:54:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x829.google.com with SMTP id f12so3838763qtf.2 for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Mon, 03 May 2021 07:54:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cdt.org; s=google; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :references:from:in-reply-to; bh=MQAYPzRVIB5gRxLXoRusA7JBOFMbQdS7saZfqn3HgQU=; b=ISdomWNlx0sVReXzUmCWSUD8sdhhBbvhrujgay9HtvrXLakvv1wdNcJxhZMzbsghxf rvR7mAOAhJiEJlkZuHzHzizCefJi+DICi5HN9Fl7sRbMokkXB7nfbLXwkvuemqJ0aUDH Qacv7GtbVmPWOk2tZ7iqfI0cCDcpbDk5O92NQ=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to; bh=MQAYPzRVIB5gRxLXoRusA7JBOFMbQdS7saZfqn3HgQU=; b=JPrIEHvcpOo1BK1HyIye4Czu+K3GviMC1GwQQkg+YDsM7iucuIuK7fqiAAdraoShPW 6aO7Sa5D2R3ZGj7hHtqbr/NiuOBgvKo2slf6p2NMpRiWQ4hj+NRpMV9z9sAF1liR/0H7 A9W7otvnOsMsTBHU2m89NgpQv96ewdxFGr6CkzaPrVGU8cvuHlnyNP/1N+QzRu9lpge+ 85USEXy7mVDtq5goB4xuukC0l4uUmC7boCZOfwo5dI5FEMHvN7HcQAgwvsTrNS7qt3+2 ySUyICnw2CF0ogZ20gNTUQGJagPIIZwMZewQcBuDgA2FxzyNpLVOMWBtFvtoazmFXmCF 0F3A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5332vFxo+nH1J7l5Alhugev8CBu3zKW6zrVPWdSFnQfNMxcNDIvZ cULbBl+IKU4ARU+lj6njVbklqA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzS08wQrlJ7HpkY7QThOUERUffvvajWyeTFw05d+Pzhoc2H26dvjrutusWC72Llau++ZCn+AA==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:425a:: with SMTP id r26mr658057qtm.268.1620053638374; Mon, 03 May 2021 07:53:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.130] (c-73-163-188-207.hsd1.dc.comcast.net. [73.163.188.207]) by smtp.gmail.com with UTF8SMTPSA id u126sm8807510qkd.80.2021.05.03.07.53.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 03 May 2021 07:53:58 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------nCxR5x8UySaUz8o90dpOIdQe"
Message-ID: <51aca4c3-8d43-00ee-a6b9-e62244d944a0@cdt.org>
Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 10:53:57 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:88.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/88.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Sandra Braman <braman@tamu.edu>, hrpc@irtf.org
References: <mailman.2330.1620051780.7119.hrpc@irtf.org> <CAB2unbM8viRjU_eE2gyAFYS14=3DVUthDbnDHVaUZhp97d606w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mallory Knodel <mknodel@cdt.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAB2unbM8viRjU_eE2gyAFYS14=3DVUthDbnDHVaUZhp97d606w@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hrpc/Q5ktmFVuW6WLITgZzQGIJhOXlHQ>
Subject: Re: [hrpc] re history lessons
X-BeenThere: hrpc@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: hrpc discussion list <hrpc.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hrpc/>
List-Post: <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 14:54:07 -0000

Hi Sandra,

It would be incorrect to minimise the impact of RFC 8280 and HRPC this 
way, Sandra.

The fact that 451 isn't as technically implementable as authors 
envisioned is orthogonal to its human rights considerations. It 
shouldn't be discounted.

I believe there are more RFCs and I-D that directly cite a human rights 
consideration, but others might chime in on which specifically.

It also won't include the ways in which people engage in draft reviews 
with human rights considerations influenced by RFC 8280. Harder to 
measure, but still worth doing.

-Mallory

On 5/3/21 10:43 AM, Sandra Braman wrote:
> Point taken, Niels, re the archive -- have read most of it but will 
> ensure it is all read and reviewed for its attention to this 
> particular question; will return to the list if questions remain.
>
> Another, if I may -- It turns out, according to Mallory and others, 
> code 451 has not actually been useful. What do members of this group 
> make out of the fact that only one RFC since publication of 8280 has 
> addressed human rights considerations, and that was the right to bear 
> arms?  Is it expected that publication of the guidelines document 
> currently in progress will make a difference?  Any advice regarding 
> where I can turn for explanations of this?
>
> Thanks again --
>
> Sandra
>
> _______________________________________________
> hrpc mailing list
> hrpc@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc

-- 
Mallory Knodel
CTO, Center for Democracy and Technology
gpg fingerprint :: E3EB 63E0 65A3 B240 BCD9 B071 0C32 A271 BD3C C780