[hrpc] Draft guidelines: updates vs obsoletes
Shivan Kaul Sahib <shivankaulsahib@gmail.com> Thu, 30 July 2020 21:17 UTC
Return-Path: <shivankaul.1993@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 173183A0D0D for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 14:17:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zNS5WWgSjX4R for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 14:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x434.google.com (mail-wr1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::434]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86D3D3A0CF4 for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 14:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x434.google.com with SMTP id f18so26177959wrs.0 for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 14:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=0Y/w/qUwU243MBZbceZ+UwFcUoQRc7fWh61wHEcn5MM=; b=cSJl40Jr3UmzuGD51Uw3CJBSPDwLUQoCf0VuIULP+QHf94MDLbxCU7xsSIlESgDnhO BT5QVzrEwRstRRTbQhOWHMQnTfrv6IfEjrvF9BFb3gus0XZM4+Ktngyve0kQOzWn8C9s U4z7GcfhXVH99DpZMxS9V4vqxzJ/sBv5/ir7h7rK/0jCnw50TkPor2UxUb8hfXRKJmiy Eb8idImmPj1divCkvptWwO01VMANnkA6aSHiGH7o0cgPIPaNeCnW8R2lfDUO1mcuM4P4 /AuN1+OpAqJ3OZK7L07LIv0DnE4BqKh1eM+RelubyQ0Z0qgDH1MgbgUWCdaMqNNfx0iO QPRQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=0Y/w/qUwU243MBZbceZ+UwFcUoQRc7fWh61wHEcn5MM=; b=Lo3vlxlUfXyfrny7ByQNnaX7cN+Fwv5xFx+Gz/aDEC4/0Ta1ck2HxV8XzzlJx3zZwX qCfqK5gaSE/iU24nJ1mbneSJnPiMJoteX1Jz/o7ciR3AJdUkJsGLYBMm87si7Ax76I20 T8yGItmfqM4R0plKLXkx2fgtvn5SnoDUwKhNM9pXdTKyyv9lWA5ztb3auEQ+EHjqNwN7 q9fAP3p4LU1NWBo/SmF+qJ++CWtc8ZBFkAZJmFE/Qy1+/lEj+1xUev5A8bK/pdh72icT U+FamT541PD6vNAJlnfxKR7aceH+pDpqUtdyeWuak/qcDFl2p/1xMER3aUu1DNGO1g9n 62Ag==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533MJoUsdQsIpUnx6PoMoN4waN7JD0HjLJx5UVkO4ZmTbt5xuoLp RsDpJ2Ai0WVd7cu2nVxJyw+rhfHcOd00CgyUoj3e7g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx1i7IGkflM9W67GjAzIDpj8oKliJ4BsAn4ichby95VN5ojFj9HnjBNF2eAVlhlUNDmN3xoMOhkdSR2lW086AI=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1141:: with SMTP id d1mr566475wrx.229.1596143833422; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 14:17:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Shivan Kaul Sahib <shivankaulsahib@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 14:16:37 -0700
Message-ID: <CAG3f7MhfbjOGNeueb8hod7kBTUX4vd=p4v7oxjonaoFg7aNRDw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Hrpc <hrpc@irtf.org>, draft-irtf-hrpc-guidelines@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000033a6b205abaf3215"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hrpc/V5CZXI6vxLbHtUTfbR0uwqhP1-0>
Subject: [hrpc] Draft guidelines: updates vs obsoletes
X-BeenThere: hrpc@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: hrpc discussion list <hrpc.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hrpc/>
List-Post: <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 21:17:23 -0000
Hi all, I mentioned in the recent HRPC meeting that I was struggling with how draft-guidelines <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-hrpc-guidelines-04> relates to RFC 8280. After some more thought, I think it would help with my confusion if draft-guidelines was intended to *obsolete* RFC 8280, instead of merely updating it. "Updated version" (from the abstract) sounds like this document will supersede RFC 8280 and can be used *in place of *it (RFC 2223 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2223#section-12>, section 12). If it is meant to be an actual update i.e. both documents can be used independently, then I would expect the new document to explicitly mention the text/sections that are updated (I like the idea of having a questionnaire in the Appendix of draft-guidelines btw) Thoughts? Shivan
- [hrpc] Draft guidelines: updates vs obsoletes Shivan Kaul Sahib
- Re: [hrpc] Draft guidelines: updates vs obsoletes Niels ten Oever