Re: [hrpc] Censorship

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Tue, 22 March 2022 15:40 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2253A12B7 for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 08:40:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.706
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.706 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6RpqL9f260YK for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 08:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DACF13A1583 for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 08:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.116.107.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 22MFeOSB006758 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Mar 2022 08:40:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1647963636; x=1648050036; i=@elandsys.com; bh=L9xBYy9twxqOzUPFmLaKD41RNfp76b/nyAu2AVp2m3E=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=zT2usTz2ua2NRrjMZiQIXDPaaR5Qh1DFJyKNQ9XYSu1qccTH+FzV3BCOeIw7WmYXl 8RX9p3ioIImXC9r3uXBZMMJt/6isFJyop/WpoqvwzlXCJ02bPYscvLPcSYEHCbeVbk /vJeXilIpDdagHTx3Yy5e6x06OSCf7R/2CU1Wub8=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20220322075625.0c8055f0@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 08:36:08 -0700
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, hrpc@irtf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <a83942ce-4751-bb19-c1b0-88bd84777e1b@gmail.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20220321085202.07188f08@elandnews.com> <f181992d-6e49-e571-0d3a-fe6c40ea9d0f@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20220322034608.0c41e928@elandnews.com> <a83942ce-4751-bb19-c1b0-88bd84777e1b@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hrpc/nEonghMLqdOSzNcoKswjJNqLmrM>
Subject: Re: [hrpc] Censorship
X-BeenThere: hrpc@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: hrpc discussion list <hrpc.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hrpc/>
List-Post: <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 15:40:47 -0000

Hi Alex,
At 05:02 AM 22-03-2022, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
>ICANN... yet another organisation to look  at for this topic, in 
>addition to ISOC Internet Policy and IRTF HRPC.
>
>Please, which ICANN email list?  Is it public for all?

There was a question (or comment) during a meeting with the ICANN 
Board.  The information about that meeting was publicly-accessible.

>But one would look at digital sovereignty to follow real-world 
>sovereignty, to make the second follow the first.
>
>For example, in the real world the sovereignty of France is not at 
>competition to that of Federation of Russia.  That is the same in 
>both languages.  So, in the digital world that should be expressed 
>similarly  But the current digital situation is that .fr wrtiten in 
>Russian is different than .fr written in latin (I will not say which 
>'primes' over another).  To improve the situation, there should be 
>disambiguation.  In both ways of expressing the country name 
>(digital and real), there should be no 'primacy'.   That 
>disaminguation will show in great detail about how respect can be 
>used, if I can say so (sorry if 'respect' is too strong).

I understood what you meant.

>Branding?  Internet is more than just brands and commerce, I think?

Yes.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy