IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hrpc] I-D Action: draft-irtf-hrpc-guidelines-02.txt

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 19 March 2019 16:34 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B05C2131071 for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 09:34:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dq6ACBXQ2asE for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 09:34:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1546B1314E1 for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 09:34:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 071E028013D; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 17:34:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay01.prive.nic.fr (pa-th3.interco.nic.fr [192.134.4.74]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015B6280134; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 17:34:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.tech.ipv6.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay01.prive.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1BE2642A7A1; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 17:34:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E920B40729; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 17:34:44 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 17:34:44 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Gurshabad Grover <gurshabad=40cis-india.org@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: hrpc@irtf.org
Message-ID: <20190319163444.usfcotj6fmfq4lsv@nic.fr>
References: <155230481684.16918.12310340882529699964@ietfa.amsl.com> <a2457f5e-f83f-04fa-7c2a-99aefc0a4a00@cis-india.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <a2457f5e-f83f-04fa-7c2a-99aefc0a4a00@cis-india.org>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 9.8
X-Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-8-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hrpc/oLfv3OOeR96c6hYqXdpMQBZzPE0>
Subject: Re: [hrpc] I-D Action: draft-irtf-hrpc-guidelines-02.txt
X-BeenThere: hrpc@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "mail@nielstenoever.net" <hrpc.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hrpc/>
List-Post: <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 16:34:50 -0000

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 12:30:05PM +0530,
 Gurshabad Grover <gurshabad=40cis-india.org@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote 
 a message of 59 lines which said:

> At the same time, a variety of IDs in the IETF are including a
> 'Human Rights Considerations' section (draft-reid-doh-operator has
> one, draft-bertola-bcp doh-clients plans to have one, and RFC8492
> also has one for what it's worth).

In the draft-reid-doh-operator, the section is also questionable (the
draft is about giving more power to ISPs and less to the users). It
illustrates the fact that the application of the broad principles of
the UDHR to concrete IETF work is not obvious.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email