Re: [hrpc] ***SPAM**** Re: Censorship

Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> Tue, 15 March 2022 18:57 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@lear.ch>
X-Original-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D1B63A156B for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 11:57:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lear.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AXN4Js-hQQrO for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 11:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (upstairs.ofcourseimright.com [185.32.222.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11A413A15EF for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 11:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.129] (77-58-144-232.dclient.hispeed.ch [77.58.144.232]) (authenticated bits=0) by upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-18) with ESMTPSA id 22FIvCGi182234 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Mar 2022 19:57:13 +0100
Authentication-Results: upstairs.ofcourseimright.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lear.ch
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lear.ch; s=upstairs; t=1647370633; bh=pC29RfAup+w1urH7v7maYomuGWbAXi9lBHb7qTV/b5E=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=qBCxXeV/9esdtxsxsfXKMP5ncGxVuI7kz3GcQSS2wFzkU6AN86c7oVePrBvpBDhPs J7phuHcYJA/0tfIQa4zmXIvJumOAY0ME7pxdnGvcTPJdYVSGO1hpsgV1/QKfR+0PMn YdtUKFURgy9IWKOuaRrKMnGoITvaAEOGPZv2n5eI=
Message-ID: <b5e6c3e8-ce86-7459-583a-43ea53f8b8cf@lear.ch>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 19:57:12 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.2
Content-Language: en-US
To: Mallory Knodel <mknodel@cdt.org>
Cc: hrpc@irtf.org
References: <1779273019.188450.1647022617139@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <AF3A93BB-04A7-4E5F-B88A-CD441369874E@nohats.ca> <1bf024c5-9044-f806-9ce9-7a3377045f48@lear.ch> <25132.19040.388723.228805@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <B41A8BB3-BBF3-4D53-A14D-E1CE4BC782DF@pch.net> <20220313214033.rysyxmydzda2v3kw@crankycanuck.ca> <DgjJ0pvzPp-nRdnSldzL0wBJfaVS74YhB-k_2rln_6ucqpbfaVYynous2WNiSrd2uZ26kaBCYfL8WauDvRvD6WYVePDWrm8zpxSfgd6BRzM=@interpeer.io> <20220314151111.eird5poe2scjoywn@crankycanuck.ca> <fa9562f7-415e-a335-be05-2b137c0a3a21@nielstenoever.net> <20220314192902.fjag7xp6jkprdiyg@crankycanuck.ca> <nTwqrqnZd6czoxYmGRXMNcr-f0rxCBjA88flQjqwNM22eFfnuvGiE-dm8_LkgyhYNVb6MA4DtATpins_9JBV_9jlV7Zeb-CYUchFkeSlot8=@interpeer.io> <af2b4edb-8c23-fd0e-e2a1-b0def85ad34b@cs.tcd.ie> <5293c470-c994-5fbb-67f5-8e996f8288f9@cdt.org>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
In-Reply-To: <5293c470-c994-5fbb-67f5-8e996f8288f9@cdt.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------00JWhaBUhCdstXvN65EICG4F"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hrpc/owjUe2JAAPP7LJWMUHSFKT2PL_0>
Subject: Re: [hrpc] ***SPAM**** Re: Censorship
X-BeenThere: hrpc@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: hrpc discussion list <hrpc.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hrpc/>
List-Post: <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 18:57:25 -0000

Just on this point:

On 15.03.22 15:50, Mallory Knodel wrote:
>
>  * Provoking Russia on national security and it will have 
> ramifications at the UN on the cybercrime treaty and any future hope 
> of a cybersecurity treaty, 

This in and of itself is worthy of discussion.  Is the UN the right 
venue for such a treaty?  What do we envision the teeth in such a treaty 
would be?  I have seen argument out of Sec. Blinken and his State 
Department that there is room for either direction.

Eliot