[hrpc] re history lessons

Sandra Braman <braman@tamu.edu> Mon, 03 May 2021 14:43 UTC

Return-Path: <braman@tamu.edu>
X-Original-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 829BF3A16A1 for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 May 2021 07:43:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tamu-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48DglvKx-GU0 for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 May 2021 07:43:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12c.google.com (mail-il1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 844623A16A7 for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Mon, 3 May 2021 07:43:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id e14so3821676ils.12 for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Mon, 03 May 2021 07:43:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tamu-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=EgS80t4CuQBdFynhWLwFLIDQ8SibnAo/zWEALc5bCnQ=; b=pi4v8fhnmKJLF6yO9zOtAoWP2cp1Bh/r4yGDGSi6n80nUhSVRgNf14dJff4AalldLk BQR2Pj1qYES1NMOVyr8418uk46DL4Znt19t4ReEEBDOcbclj9PpIfkuffwsBKkic/YZK ow4MZbF/GKJfS1+1VSYiK/gCn+R4f1PMgpbyIxOb2rxGBJhzyuxOkfFPYREjsXNscNBJ o39mjuSXKKLV1cBHwqUnQFILdGhxOVzoBV+MHofQ2TT9LlFvmDAuH0Zs3Rhoz5qJawab L3hhtjYUmD7llEDxLXyOYNHakwpeWdzH32pxkj+AMM10kWslnHXLN+1Rji6R4cPwOTFk qoxA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=EgS80t4CuQBdFynhWLwFLIDQ8SibnAo/zWEALc5bCnQ=; b=FUElIdVSYoDmgaU35x5I2fAyjQr8JNP3dCxiW20+2PAmjZSRYDlq+mLafU5zcZYNXz 4KSsadxjspXR8Z8/UwOByLcfEEbCDYbkJotr4Q184qaOGxlCTIBAPege7dl2e20/eQWY ePz0B+uO5zODmtkeX1dFuazRq/GfmUAr3FfJ48PfTm+9XvHYXlqFyGmO+3RfQlvJM/Ej F9EsWO/ana/qZILALvR1Wp5kv4XKxGzDNARQVmo4Gk0v1/39VDgrWQ7s7oStiV8f3JOL NhjN9RWY+d6vpIbyRY/a4IUjcGbqCoAXaxS2r8X/vxZUdH6iUjPUox1KjaDZOHnXVTWq vGLg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531KiyfaGZLuaCbv+MIqv1IFA5DTr8YISgpHttzs7hvVlDzHEdqT 1akMfy+L0j8HCGVOvmlLnMGWpddW77wxTM0OAAPCoWJL/n0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxzAoMiDDKwRZ+gJK164FtU3jCtKtRIhKygSnBAUC3MMa0ZqtICqjw88bZ+ggHFZCZXUt5sAfflrqtkL86bv3U=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:ea9:: with SMTP id u9mr9064069ilj.303.1620053026836; Mon, 03 May 2021 07:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <mailman.2330.1620051780.7119.hrpc@irtf.org>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.2330.1620051780.7119.hrpc@irtf.org>
From: Sandra Braman <braman@tamu.edu>
Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 09:43:11 -0500
Message-ID: <CAB2unbM8viRjU_eE2gyAFYS14=3DVUthDbnDHVaUZhp97d606w@mail.gmail.com>
To: hrpc@irtf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002ea5fe05c16dfd0a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hrpc/uPPyAiQkV_5pMQstZTM1HCoriQY>
Subject: [hrpc] re history lessons
X-BeenThere: hrpc@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: hrpc discussion list <hrpc.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hrpc/>
List-Post: <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 14:43:52 -0000

Point taken, Niels, re the archive -- have read most of it but will ensure
it is all read and reviewed for its attention to this particular question;
will return to the list if questions remain.

Another, if I may -- It turns out, according to Mallory and others, code
451 has not actually been useful. What do members of this group make out of
the fact that only one RFC since publication of 8280 has addressed human
rights considerations, and that was the right to bear arms?  Is it expected
that publication of the guidelines document currently in progress will make
a difference?  Any advice regarding where I can turn for explanations of
this?

Thanks again --

Sandra