[http-auth] Closing WG

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 01 February 2017 17:22 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82AAD1294F8 for <http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 09:22:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DI4saM1SWzkt for <http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 09:22:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22a.google.com (mail-qt0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B25FD1294E8 for <http-auth@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 09:22:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id w20so203623258qtb.1 for <http-auth@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 09:22:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=xw8+qfwO/0pnVSu1Lx6o5i1jkE8Pd8j+OOmMxxC+dmg=; b=WhJS1tV32wc8mAZ/uZgpBdIoeE8n8jLXf1KYyRVxZwZxCbB5un7l1Z4oJhkK/jRAfn 8fuIPQGVZVCCsxbIjTOEZTUCP95K4Ag2jc4psS4yTkEGUALXn5OohN3SVc75Ki8MabCO 7yDr+WDn17IFYqpbmU8yFgLm4WacotpG9RL1ZQzEkKKBEhVzGgAQMMhOPDvNIlH1KrIO m67lFXnCDJjZkFOH6FFP90Kq4STJZh+XUZDyQcbLjB/WUYpwPu041Jefr2kp2ZDPX4v/ B65H1pobppe3L9p/wbxX9ibWu+hNBLdREMuMM0erlViWBKTP4nRTaGLs6BuEmSYb4kZw XZng==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=xw8+qfwO/0pnVSu1Lx6o5i1jkE8Pd8j+OOmMxxC+dmg=; b=F4l4kDbJ7NvO49UiLh47Fai8/G0VjQ8NyPYC/0NOWjllQVi6oohaTtQcmNc6eeBDxX L4Gfh+DeWQgzttf8nkuTNwdZf5WeuUigLgZZPUE+aOgSkbgmB2xKxQyaWc5QVw2K+XTZ yJRhPZ7hZloC3vgLx12bTR3+po/cd1qF285/7Upmt3nBIWED9RBcmKu0SLS1qV2alpZ1 YFtWAIQ9/ETlX6uDgSBPOa07w7BANtyg/63Xc+2vKt1rZoAP9wAy/NCsYiLJrdZ4bNwG I8rDkg5rtHFiPInvCUhtZ5g4IZ1kG1b1rPzg0KOuDR6Pv3rm+HtHc+SjsdumSSJvMpAr 0FpQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLrNtGIDztgoJYxBtG4UVkIhbDWK9zJEt0MRXGawZ5sGhn/WU4aOdCxmkHnxoyRMrY797bsHwUX58DD0w==
X-Received: by 10.200.37.141 with SMTP id e13mr3777126qte.226.1485969747088; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 09:22:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.170.30 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 09:22:26 -0800 (PST)
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 12:22:26 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH6Y5xcpzSaa+QAoxBuHHXQxd9zOsC=dvPfeDmkdwBPDZQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "http-auth@ietf.org" <http-auth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/http-auth/D3HNF8ftO-Mq_tMePcX9CrBdkpo>
Subject: [http-auth] Closing WG
X-BeenThere: http-auth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: HTTP authentication methods <http-auth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/http-auth>, <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/http-auth/>
List-Post: <mailto:http-auth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-auth>, <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 17:22:31 -0000

Hello,

Thank you to everyone in the WG for completing the drafts in queue and
getting multiple new HTTPAuth (experimental) methods published.  Thank
you also for your detailed work documenting the problems with Basic
and Digest in the updated RFCs, these are all very helpful and getting
quite a few references by other RFCs.

The work was well done and it's very nice to see it come to
completion, congratulations!

Thank you also to the chairs for all your hard work steering the
working group and shepherding drafts.

I did consult with the chairs who don't expect another draft to pop
until after Chicago.  The list will remain open and if there's a need
to open a WG for additional drafts, that can be evaluated.  AD
sponsoring drafts is also possible with discussions taking place on
list.

-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen