Re: [http-auth] WGLC on the MutualAuth drafts

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 05 July 2016 15:09 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC25912D626 for <http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 08:09:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yjih2w4nOaA4 for <http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 08:09:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com (mail-wm0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D22ED12D629 for <http-auth@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 08:09:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x229.google.com with SMTP id r201so156914735wme.1 for <http-auth@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 08:09:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=bpQ301HoiSarLQa4uHmuh17QUqsF4L2veh+PbrOCtmg=; b=wf7bhBbEQJNJa8cVYrdROnPzcXyzNarSCtp2U8Kl5XRfz9idNFoUuBUxQBZ+dVRxKn RbYwH3U3TjVzCyFj4qWRoM17t1qYPfTrudX+K/RrLXFUuFQa6W5YyhmmpldroA8hQaMB DRW+K/qpY8Qw6LSbHvMh7A9krayAlXCl29a1C1fu8L1DnoYLzBqaWklT/Aj+JnV52p97 yXNGflWl7zZJa8WQoC4wLZgG8Mjtp0X028zS3BYRSP3AvfM4KjK1dLvo4NzlTn4/gJEQ Mrv7U/Cs4q1Lz5xcN6VMg7wRTVwSLjBMn32SPlX5NvR6veJiUcs7/HLhxx28WrzzW2+S 9eCg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=bpQ301HoiSarLQa4uHmuh17QUqsF4L2veh+PbrOCtmg=; b=QxPNHFMzPKrO59VazyxvbmoUXVPwOtdfCgUHEteFAM8eig4R0JsorXrqiDSG8nAmZa LM0LsoyuMfP6NZf9/D89EONMYXc581hdkNYFev2EFo/mIdhJL7ZKOU+TTNaNL0/WMuAf iK45EIyWCpEJHhqsKhbqp2JvTVYPj14mYGPDdz6FLlhi5/2TWK9lfPcSK4OnEtSEnHij tvleUwWrMcKl7KRQIqvXxvy2h9OSyFN+XK8EAa4bqK2NLCEiz2N2VWpPYUfPuS6egqbq SRS01qfRNJ6hFsL5bXfvUNVbT5YaT44q4Fi5BhypjuaO8Mx4gFbnCrRTb05q9zpDUAWX XvfQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tI8/Cx3UlEWP30aED5FcH/6MouImKTb4xtQIZRSMHQomj1SQ+ialdGvMJ+hHEpP3A==
X-Received: by 10.194.177.230 with SMTP id ct6mr15683051wjc.170.1467731383182; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 08:09:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.24.249.249] (dyn32-131.checkpoint.com. [194.29.32.131]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r190sm3249766wme.17.2016.07.05.08.09.41 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Jul 2016 08:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2ae31156-2a49-3cf4-9ba2-36bb8d24abb1@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:09:40 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <783B6CFB-2522-4144-B883-2D83F1689EFF@gmail.com>
References: <2DBE893A-434D-4B67-BF12-AEFBDE7A23B7@gmail.com> <32b9df1f-b61d-405e-d935-5d964d9acbb6@gmx.de> <TY1PR01MB0588EA2490634AD993244DF1A0390@TY1PR01MB0588.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com> <084b1a6f-3d32-ef37-da7c-7ed6d958974c@gmx.de> <A4419C58-1777-4A03-9390-6C5EA4412BF2@gmail.com> <2ae31156-2a49-3cf4-9ba2-36bb8d24abb1@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/http-auth/UpK2NJYSGVELndE9U7Jgoldr7iA>
Cc: httpauth mailing list <http-auth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [http-auth] WGLC on the MutualAuth drafts
X-BeenThere: http-auth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: HTTP authentication methods <http-auth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/http-auth>, <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/http-auth/>
List-Post: <mailto:http-auth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-auth>, <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 15:09:49 -0000

> On 5 Jul 2016, at 2:39 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> On 2016-07-05 13:26, Yoav Nir wrote:
>> I’m not sure I follow what kind of coordination is needed here. IMO the -extension document is ready to go to IETF LC (after the authors make the necessary changes you’ve already discussed). I think it’s going to be past the IESG before 5987bis is ready. Do you see any need to make this document depend on 5987bis instead of 5987? Will making this change require any changes to the ABNF in the document?
> 
> Yes, IMHO it would require changes.

OK. Any chance you and the authors can get the changes done before Friday’s deadline?

> 
>> If not, I think we can proceed with a reference to 5987, and then when 5987bis obsoletes 5987 it will still be fine. Am I missing something?
> 
> Technically it would still be fine, but it would have a normative reference on an obsoleted spec.
> 
> I think it would be better to coordinate, and have this new document reference 5987bis.
> 
> Best regards, Julian
> 
> 
>