Re: [http-auth] WGLC on the MutualAuth drafts

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 05 July 2016 19:15 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD6A12D1A3 for <http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KhiSQnn5lnUI for <http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:15:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com (mail-wm0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5A5912D54C for <http-auth@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id z126so87121773wme.0 for <http-auth@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 12:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=rvW86j0nk+LprMhIr9VWRs7ztu/nmfw5Ps/HmwcXph4=; b=Tw/EhHeUn5m4vLGiE/nubBeonkyGCyAc35WKhgmD1vkdS5SejmzfDd37+l36soys80 bfrWzM8qohLY1vpqTen/MU2S3KB6hQpkZ/Y3z0N4Id6lRydn4opVIyluzr+kXTAafHgF sBxmR482UzY0PEDo3uYyec0VQmv5amdSNgGvei7uoARJs0AyfcSZwlTkgWUsYo7nFp7W yXCmuSP9ywsRQ2Jllngq88SD7pKoDjmgacnCeue7uVGFedHc0F+9evUZU4NGjOBWdro7 u5EVcAGipadkc3cTpl2rEqbtrrUyHWien+rPouOWE0YTKRyVAJEr71crnWQqEq1w3yqa BahQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=rvW86j0nk+LprMhIr9VWRs7ztu/nmfw5Ps/HmwcXph4=; b=RIs1BVOaEh7MlmnIwV20slpB0zdBwE4PUBS6/Oqtjm5nxlzLRwFju5So+EDtDou6Ec vrFgEsxT0QGyD+5IfHpd6VPvDUow/vzcqT+m/+wbqL7cRSs3rACWR2vQuIXbm3pm0vc8 Iv+TB/I0RSsbuP2CsxbMXFoy4C8lVnE0Wga3/6W1zJbELab6BDu+JC1SBKkUDWFwmdlW AFdwmc32DEMhimYuMWUxOPp530AYJFV8/GFdPsV4NKYxwddoIi6oVDTW4EJLR3fnUtwX 4edogCLfJd7tXVWJDq0UhcF4Dq3qtclAUcKikORVfNyg5cOqgCS+U4J/Exj9oTbRrIIY fRcw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tK1Pv0GQAofrt1Gq8etSeLZFslbKl43l120eevDy0tgfihj8spUwqhaMl0BuIm2rA==
X-Received: by 10.28.141.4 with SMTP id p4mr18397458wmd.46.1467746125248; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 12:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.14] ([46.120.57.147]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z1sm2631345wjh.14.2016.07.05.12.15.23 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Jul 2016 12:15:24 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <f5ffc228-29d4-3f27-ce0b-c71ebfdb862f@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 22:15:22 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <24F1DDCD-43CC-4FCD-9D4A-4EFF3DBFE981@gmail.com>
References: <2DBE893A-434D-4B67-BF12-AEFBDE7A23B7@gmail.com> <32b9df1f-b61d-405e-d935-5d964d9acbb6@gmx.de> <TY1PR01MB0588EA2490634AD993244DF1A0390@TY1PR01MB0588.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com> <084b1a6f-3d32-ef37-da7c-7ed6d958974c@gmx.de> <A4419C58-1777-4A03-9390-6C5EA4412BF2@gmail.com> <2ae31156-2a49-3cf4-9ba2-36bb8d24abb1@gmx.de> <783B6CFB-2522-4144-B883-2D83F1689EFF@gmail.com> <f5ffc228-29d4-3f27-ce0b-c71ebfdb862f@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/http-auth/gJKVQWno9Acxcte2c30mkNfIw14>
Cc: httpauth mailing list <http-auth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [http-auth] WGLC on the MutualAuth drafts
X-BeenThere: http-auth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: HTTP authentication methods <http-auth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/http-auth>, <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/http-auth/>
List-Post: <mailto:http-auth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-auth>, <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 19:15:29 -0000

> On 5 Jul 2016, at 6:17 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> On 2016-07-05 17:09, Yoav Nir wrote:
>> 
>>> On 5 Jul 2016, at 2:39 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 2016-07-05 13:26, Yoav Nir wrote:
>>>> I’m not sure I follow what kind of coordination is needed here. IMO the -extension document is ready to go to IETF LC (after the authors make the necessary changes you’ve already discussed). I think it’s going to be past the IESG before 5987bis is ready. Do you see any need to make this document depend on 5987bis instead of 5987? Will making this change require any changes to the ABNF in the document?
>>> 
>>> Yes, IMHO it would require changes.
>> 
>> OK. Any chance you and the authors can get the changes done before Friday’s deadline?
> 
> Very unlikely on my side.

So what kind of changes are we talking about?  Just the ABNF block, or a bunch of surrounding text?

The reason I’m asking is that I think if it’s just the ABNF we can progress the document with a note to the AD that the ABNF will need an update, and finish that during IETF last call. Otherwise we’re delaying by another 3-4 weeks. Of course, considering how long this has been in process 3-4 extra weeks are no big deal, but why procrastinate if we don’t have to?

Regards,

Yoav