IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [http-auth] Basic authentication scheme post IETF-LC , secdir, and IESG review updates

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 03 March 2015 18:20 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8FB1A8822 for <http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 10:20:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kRHKOk0_9p-I for <http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 10:20:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-x235.google.com (mail-la0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D114C1A87F1 for <http-auth@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 10:20:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by lamq1 with SMTP id q1so16151693lam.0 for <http-auth@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 10:20:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=JXRn0p9LYoTVRamZVekxOcsPKz3cTvMK2qnUppU2cIw=; b=fdmVzSLgjv2IYuzevNTtNP/oBSx9exvPFsXaLi0jiGvZzNZhME1PKkH5eUvo1gbLpo QBjlVnrn0cv7AxpvYWu0Nw1ge6fcBPqz5C8aru6W9JACViNiYzAzxq55Vd9GtlcAtmZg 55LXB8T+DBxJ42Urz+umogUdeR2cK4Zp30mWZlcWlNl0DdleMqZL0BtcyfXD+Qus1KL4 3tCYHzPnvRb3d1YNWXJq53Ei16j1HC+28TIQGq4+n8cmb+c8Rf0FJq5YL7KRY106cLx4 DtH6CjfdvB5GJZWKNep7O5pgf52OJ/7ZxIsg5j1yPi3ZeWlqDYnRSkY3ytWh/G8Rj33H wMxQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.87.134 with SMTP id ay6mr57132lab.75.1425406835211; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 10:20:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.167.101 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 10:20:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <7CD024DA-1A12-4271-BA90-2FCA650764FC@gmail.com>
References: <54E75907.8040505@gmx.de> <54F1FA63.5020505@gmx.de> <7CD024DA-1A12-4271-BA90-2FCA650764FC@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 13:20:35 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH4vcZQ_D3co8XVa_k=Grz0cxOLzYVYZj40WiGh_qTbAQQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c25e5412c4160510666461"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/http-auth/n5WET2ZEM4kIQg6_wJx307HfuRw>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "http-auth@ietf.org" <http-auth@ietf.org>, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
Subject: Re: [http-auth] Basic authentication scheme post IETF-LC , secdir, and IESG review updates
X-BeenThere: http-auth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: HTTP authentication methods <http-auth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/http-auth>, <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-auth/>
List-Post: <mailto:http-auth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-auth>, <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 18:20:41 -0000

Hello,

I read through the changes provided n the update and appreciate your work,
Julian, to address the SecDir review and IESG comments.  Since I held the
discuss, I don't want to see the draft held up and ensured the prior
agreement on list was met in the draft.  I do agree that a few of the items
would be nice to address, but that it could be done in a separate draft as
not to hold this one up.

Thank you all!

On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Kathleen’s DISCUSS ballot is about the SecDir review.
>
> Daniel, are you OK with the changes in version -07?
>
> Thanks
>
> Yoav
>
> > On Feb 28, 2015, at 7:26 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 2015-02-20 16:55, Julian Reschke wrote:
> >> Hi there,
> >>
> >> I've made a bunch of changes to address IETF-LC, secdif, and IESG
> >> feedback. The draft has not been submitted yet, but all changes are in
> >> the WG's svn repository
> >> (<
> https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/httpauth/draft-ietf-httpauth-basicauth-update/latest/
> >).
> >>
> >>
> >> The changes relative to the IETF LC draft (05) are:
> >> <
> http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpauth-basicauth-update-latest-from-ietflc.diff.html
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> The full text is in
> >> <
> http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpauth-basicauth-update-latest.html
> >
> >> and
> >> <
> http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpauth-basicauth-update-latest.txt
> >).
> >>
> >>
> >> Feedback welcome!
> >>
> >> Best regards, Julian
> >
> > I didn't see any feedback, so I went ahead and submitted this as draft
> -07.
> >
> > Best regards, Julian
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > http-auth mailing list
> > http-auth@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-auth
>
> _______________________________________________
> http-auth mailing list
> http-auth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-auth
>



-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email