IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [http-state] I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-21.txt

Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com> Fri, 18 February 2011 06:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@adambarth.com>
X-Original-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5F13A6D35 for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:43:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.177, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XxrPyWrMfCap for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:43:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B4833A6D10 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:43:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iym1 with SMTP id 1so3410232iym.31 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:43:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.42.19.70 with SMTP id a6mr471275icb.84.1298011429510; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:43:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d21sm1437338ibg.15.2011.02.17.22.43.48 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:43:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iwl42 with SMTP id 42so19192iwl.31 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:43:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.231.37.200 with SMTP id y8mr268311ibd.105.1298011428073; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:43:48 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.215.67 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:43:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4D5E127C.7080508@gmx.de>
References: <20110119231502.3778.58453.idtracker@localhost> <4D37F4EE.80700@gmx.de> <4D5E127C.7080508@gmx.de>
From: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:43:18 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTinGO3BfcMC9HGeAacPyic9_-fiurJJNUYEAERMe@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "http-state@ietf.org" <http-state@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [http-state] I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-21.txt
X-BeenThere: http-state@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state>
List-Post: <mailto:http-state@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 06:43:20 -0000

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 20.01.2011 09:40, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 20.01.2011 00:15, Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>>> directories.
>>> This draft is a work item of the HTTP State Management Mechanism
>>> Working Group of the IETF.
>>>
>>>
>>> Title : HTTP State Management Mechanism
>>> Author(s) : A. Barth
>>> Filename : draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-21.txt
>>> Pages : 43
>>> Date : 2011-01-19
>>> ...
>>
>> Nit: there's an unused reference to RFC 5246, probably caused by a
>> change in draft 20
>> (<http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-20.txt>
>> and
>>
>> <http://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-21.txt>).
>>
>>
>> There's also ABNF text that needs to be reformatted due to the width
>> constraints...
>> ...
>
> These problems are still present in draft 22...

Fixed.

> Also note:
>
>  -- The draft header indicates that this document obsoletes RFC2965, but the
>     abstract doesn't seem to mention this, which it should.
>
> (<http://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-22.txt>)

Is there boilerplate text we should use for that?

Adam

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email