Re: [http-state] Updated draft

[Daniel Stenberg <[e-mail]>]

On Sat, 15 Aug 2009, Adam Barth wrote:

>> The section about the sorting of the cookie-list. Do implementations really
>> bother about in which order
>
> Yes.  The bit about sorting by path length is definitely required for 
> compatibility.  I remember reading some old bug reports about that.  I 
> suspect the bit about creation date is important too, although I don't have 
> concrete examples of sites that break.

Hm, ok. It would be very interesting if you can come up with real-world cases 
where this is actually enforced/checked since curl doesn't do any sorting of 
this kind and I would be surprised if all other cookie implementations do.

-- 

  / daniel.haxx.se