[http-state] Meeting in Anaheim?

David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com> Sun, 17 January 2010 04:58 UTC

Return-Path: <dwm@xpasc.com>
X-Original-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39D03A6800 for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 20:58:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.953
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.953 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-4.646, BAYES_00=-2.599, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C+ifPt8-xbjH for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 20:58:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.xpasc.com (mail.xpasc.com [68.164.244.189]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD9F3A67B2 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 20:58:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bslepgate.xpasc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bslepgate.xpasc.com (Postfix-out) with ESMTP id 92BAF10183D for <http-state@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 20:58:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Propel-Return-Path: <dwm@xpasc.com>
Received: from mail.xpasc.com ([10.1.2.88]) by [127.0.0.1] ([127.0.0.1]) (port 7027) (Abaca EPG outproxy filter 3.1.1.9347 $Rev: 9262 $) id iz6Ura1h4W50; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 20:58:05 -0800
Received: from xpasc.com (egate.xpasc.com [10.1.2.49]) by bslepgate.xpasc.com (Postfix-out) with ESMTP id 7B48010183C for <http-state@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 20:58:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from egate.xpasc.com (egate.xpasc.com [10.1.2.49]) by xpasc.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0H4w49N025728 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 20:58:04 -0800
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 20:58:04 -0800
From: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
cc: http-state <http-state@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <7789133a1001160001h62d203b3w76e175ec22d55e6@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1001162056420.6291@egate.xpasc.com>
References: <7789133a1001160001h62d203b3w76e175ec22d55e6@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-Propel-ID: iz6Ura1h4W50
Subject: [http-state] Meeting in Anaheim?
X-BeenThere: http-state@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state>
List-Post: <mailto:http-state@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 04:58:13 -0000

Is a WG meeting planned for Anaheim? If the HTTPBIS group is meeting
hopefully coordinated to not conflict and be the same day?

Dave