IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [http-state] Date parsing (was Re: consensus call: cookie server conformance)

Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> Mon, 31 January 2011 14:06 UTC

Return-Path: <daniel@haxx.se>
X-Original-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FDB13A6BED for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:06:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.602, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q6Uc-HUyjVwm for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:06:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from giant.haxx.se (giant.haxx.se [80.67.6.50]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13C4A3A6B32 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:06:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from giant.haxx.se (giant.haxx.se [80.67.6.50]) by giant.haxx.se (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1) with ESMTP id p0VE9lhv013835; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:09:47 +0100
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:09:47 +0100
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
X-X-Sender: dast@giant.haxx.se
To: Dan Winship <dan.winship@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D46C1B6.8030100@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1101311508360.28922@tvnag.unkk.fr>
References: <AANLkTikTG0cu-q+OxLFvc9WeLgZMrfooZ9Ndoc=AmGDq@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1101292300070.1561@tvnag.unkk.fr> <op.vp546pcd64w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook-pro.local> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1101311141230.26269@tvnag.unkk.fr> <op.vp559k1664w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook-pro.local> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1101311254360.26269@tvnag.unkk.fr> <4D46C045.4070101@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1101311500240.28922@tvnag.unkk.fr> <4D46C1B6.8030100@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
X-fromdanielhimself: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, IETF HTTP State WG <http-state@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [http-state] Date parsing (was Re: consensus call: cookie server conformance)
X-BeenThere: http-state@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state>
List-Post: <mailto:http-state@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:06:34 -0000

On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Dan Winship wrote:

> At the moment, I have no plans to "fix" my date parser to conform (though 
> I'm not ruling it out either).

Does this mean your parser is better (than the spec) in some aspects that you 
think are necesary?

-- 

  / daniel.haxx.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email