Re: [http-state] Updated draft

Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> Mon, 17 August 2009 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <daniel@haxx.se>
X-Original-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E403A6937 for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.776
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.776 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.527, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3CAtJqRsoxET for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:57:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kluster1.contactor.se (kluster1.contactor.se [91.191.140.11]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1423A67BE for <http-state@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:57:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linux2.contactor.se (linux2.contactor.se [91.191.140.14]) by kluster1.contactor.se (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n7HHvFsK021738; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:57:15 +0200
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:57:15 +0200
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
X-X-Sender: dast@linux2.contactor.se
To: Bil Corry <bil@corry.biz>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0908171946460.24390@yvahk2.pbagnpgbe.fr>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0908171956200.24390@yvahk2.pbagnpgbe.fr>
References: <7789133a0908151008p35ff30e6w2761368fe70d41a6@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0908152250410.18461@yvahk2.pbagnpgbe.fr> <7789133a0908151642w47c1dbf1x48268e657b0d71cc@mail.gmail.com> <4A8986A3.9000403@corry.biz> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0908171946460.24390@yvahk2.pbagnpgbe.fr>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
X-fromdanielhimself: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: http-state <http-state@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [http-state] Updated draft
X-BeenThere: http-state@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state>
List-Post: <mailto:http-state@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:57:16 -0000

On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Daniel Stenberg wrote:

>> And differences in cookie size support (although this conflicts with 
>> results Daniel Stenberg posted earlier[2]):
>
> Hm, well my tests should be perfectly repeatable and as I posted my code for 
> the tests you can review it and see for yourself (or re-implement them using 
> something else). I couldn't find any specific details on how mr Zakas got 
> his numbers.

Oh, his numbers is for the whole "NAME=VAR" construct while my tests only 
evaluated the max lenth of NAME. Could explain a bit.

-- 

  / daniel.haxx.se