Subject: Re: [http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (4148)
From: Adam Barth <[email-masked]>
To: RFC Errata System <[email-masked]>
Cc: http-state <[email-masked]>, Pete Resnick <[email-masked]>, Barry Leiba <[email-masked]>, Zhong Yu <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 19:37:02 -0700
List-Id: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state.ietf.org>

Yep, seems right to me.

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:13 PM, RFC Errata System
<[email-masked]> wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6265,
> "HTTP State Management Mechanism".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6265&eid=4148
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Zhong Yu <[email-masked]>
>
> Section: 5.1.1
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>    day-of-month    = 1*2DIGIT ( non-digit *OCTET )
> ...
>    year            = 2*4DIGIT ( non-digit *OCTET )
>    time            = hms-time ( non-digit *OCTET )
>
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    day-of-month    = 1*2DIGIT [ non-digit *OCTET ]
> ...
>    year            = 2*4DIGIT [ non-digit *OCTET ]
>    time            = hms-time [ non-digit *OCTET ]
>
>
> Notes
> -----
> The trailing extra chars for these fields should be *optional*, not *required*.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6265 (draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-23)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : HTTP State Management Mechanism
> Publication Date    : April 2011
> Author(s)           : A. Barth
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : HTTP State Management Mechanism
> Area                : Applications
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>