Re: [http-state] fyi: IETF conflict review results for draft-secure-cookie-session-protocol

Thomas Fossati <tho@koanlogic.com> Fri, 07 December 2012 11:03 UTC

Return-Path: <tho@koanlogic.com>
X-Original-To: http-state@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-state@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2928D21F86CB for <http-state@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 03:03:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oUhSoVS1zZMb for <http-state@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 03:03:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-f44.google.com (mail-la0-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64BBA21F86B9 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 03:03:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id d3so288885lah.31 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 03:03:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=qkzeoLNmg4t8S1libHIjEy5rWzfFTeACILQ15FU3QnU=; b=YDT/vZ4nTh/QIvEImv4nGpic1IC8/irt0/defZkTYYTZ8agAHNDI7gChzmdx0QLNRS 5NI4d07fqpiZc24M27UBqLxdKd75w+VqbFaqx6SdlcLoRg9Cs7xNks2C5wDjHCRkmGKz qGxJPgsTx63mkajTVL16I3OkaVkRmeqjU6YlsQEh1ApTmU2xkVslhkwEwmYGDcrNtHzG oAJkZFPVDWHODRhlHjn+Th71cuffSn//doQvtoY3g4pOvsUfbRs0GFwSgRafXhlLrqGp 6ByOXCY5y7J/A/2E2A2dxuERe9ycW1qfReI1UbVNLOAs3ihy1QFWhESKcwtRfFUv9o8A zevQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.147.100 with SMTP id tj4mr4963645lab.42.1354878194064; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 03:03:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.29.10 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 03:03:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [81.134.152.4]
In-Reply-To: <50C0E264.1010601@KingsMountain.com>
References: <50C0E264.1010601@KingsMountain.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 11:03:14 +0000
Message-ID: <CAByMhx8d9YzgvOKLb=9X=Kq-tVrLD2PAm778JR6PJ8OZ3U3r7A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Thomas Fossati <tho@koanlogic.com>
To: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnWrOnTftiSMw4c63u0vD42nDpjPNoeBtp9qCbTYzdO9xXiFBXX76UvYHesl52jWwvILLQU
Cc: HTTP State <http-state@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [http-state] fyi: IETF conflict review results for draft-secure-cookie-session-protocol
X-BeenThere: http-state@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state>
List-Post: <mailto:http-state@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 11:03:16 -0000

Daniel,

On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 6:22 PM, =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@kingsmountain.com> wrote:
> that spec was/is driven by KoanLogic folks, whom I presume have an
> implementation.

we have a reference implementation here:

  https://github.com/koanlogic/libscs

Anyway, SCS is basically a server side tool, I guess it would not add
any value to libcurl.

Cheers, Thomas.