Re: [http-state] I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-04.txt

"Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com> Tue, 23 February 2010 17:08 UTC

Return-Path: <annevk@opera.com>
X-Original-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF7028C324; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:08:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.923, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t7XlIglTNRHj; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:08:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.opera.com (smtp.opera.com [213.236.208.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C29E928C26C; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:08:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from annevk-t60 (5355737B.cable.casema.nl [83.85.115.123]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.opera.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id o1NHA2hl031363 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:10:03 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
To: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org, i-d-announce@ietf.org
References: <20100223161504.7E9D128C1C6@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:10:02 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
Organization: Opera Software ASA
Message-ID: <op.u8lba0ze64w2qv@annevk-t60>
In-Reply-To: <20100223161504.7E9D128C1C6@core3.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.10 (Linux)
Cc: http-state@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [http-state] I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-04.txt
X-BeenThere: http-state@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state>
List-Post: <mailto:http-state@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:08:04 -0000

On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:15:04 +0100, <Internet-Drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
> The cookie protocol has many
> historical infelicities and should be avoided for new applications of
> HTTP.

What exactly does this mean? There's no suitable replacement for cookies  
available currently so giving this advice seems a bit premature, but maybe  
I misunderstand what it says.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/