Re: [http-state] Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-18.txt> (HTTP State Management Mechanism) to Proposed Standard

On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> FWIW, I support publication; this is a very well-written spec, and a long overdue revision.

Thanks.

> One small suggestion: it may be worthwhile to point out that the presence of a Cookie request header or Set-Cookie response header does not preclude HTTP caches from storing and reusing a response.

I've added a sentence to this effect to the overview.

Adam

> On 19/11/2010, at 6:30 AM, The IESG wrote:
>> The IESG has received a request from the HTTP State Management Mechanism
>> WG (httpstate) to consider the following document:
>> - 'HTTP State Management Mechanism'
>>  <draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-18.txt> as a Proposed Standard
>>
>> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
>> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
>> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2010-12-02. Exceptionally, comments may be
>> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
>> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>>
>> The file can be obtained via
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie/
>>
>> IESG discussion can be tracked via
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie/
>>
>>
>> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>> _______________________________________________
>> http-state mailing list
>> http-state@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>